Using Overall Equipment Effectiveness for Manufacturing System Design

Cesarotti, Vittorio; Giuiusa, Alessio; Introna, Vito

doi:10.5772/56089

Cited by 8 publications

(13 citation statements)

References 11 publications

(6 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Examples of these are overall equipment effectiveness (Cesarotti et al 2013), agility (Putnik et al 2007), and energy consumption (Yang et al 2013). Whatever goals an organization may have, the first activity is always taking measurements.…”

Section: 2mentioning

confidence: 99%

Methods and Tools for Performance Assurance of Smart Manufacturing Systems

Kibira

Morris

Kumaraguru

2015

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The emerging concept of smart manufacturing systems is defined in part by the introduction of new technologies that are promoting rapid and widespread information flow within the manufacturing system and surrounding its control. These systems can deliver unprecedented awareness, agility, productivity, and resilience within the production process by exploiting the ever-increasing availability of real-time manufacturing data. Optimized collection and analysis of this voluminous data and subsequent distribution of extracted information to guide decisionmaking throughout the enterprise necessitate, however, a complex and dynamic process. To establish and maintain confidence that smart manufacturing systems function as intended, performance assurance measures will be vital.The activities for performance assurance span manufacturing system design, operation, performance assessment, evaluation, analysis, decision making, and control. Changes may be needed for traditional approaches in these activities to address smart manufacturing systems. This paper reviews the current methods and tools used for establishing and maintaining required system performance. This paper then identifies trends in data and information systems, integration, performance measurement, analysis, and performance improvement that will be vital for assured performance of smart manufacturing systems. Finally, we analyze how those trends apply to the methods studied and propose future research for assessing and improving manufacturing performance in the uncertain, multi-objective operating environment.

show abstract

Section: 2mentioning

confidence: 99%

Methods and Tools for Performance Assurance of Smart Manufacturing Systems

Kibira

Morris

Kumaraguru

2015

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…This is improper to focus only on single process or equipment but not treating all processes as a whole entity. This is because the performance of single equipment in a production is generally influenced by the performance of other systems to which it is interconnected (Cesarotti, et al, 2013). The relations between processes is one of the grey area of OEE implementation which focuses on single equipment only.…”

Section: Characteristics Of Equipment Utilization Without Consideratimentioning

confidence: 99%

Invisibility of impact from customer demand and relations between processes in Overall Equipment Effectiveness (OEE)

Teoh

Ito

Perumal

2017

JAMDSM

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Performance is defined relative to how well specific objectives and goals are achieved. Examples of these are overall equipment effectiveness [12], agility [13], and energy consumption [14]. Regardless of the goals that an organization may have, the first activity is always focused on taking measurements.…”

Section: Performance Assurance As Quality Assurancementioning

confidence: 99%

“…Cesarotti et al [12] proposed overall http://dx.doi.org/10.6028/jres.121.013 equipment effectiveness (OEE) as a quantitative measure of productivity of production equipment in industry. OEE has been used to monitor and control production and can be used to enhance availability, performance, and quality by using smart technologies.…”

Section: Targeted Performance Objective For Smart Manufacturing -Prodmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Davis et al [2] point out that performance objectives focusing on productivity (input/output) should be replaced by those that target improving customization, flexibility, responsiveness, energy efficiency, and overall environmental effectiveness. White [152] presented case studies of actual implementations of new measurements, modeling, analysis and control for SMS while Cesarotti et al [12] proposed additional measures including capacity utilization, saturation, quality, and availability.…”

Section: Targeted Performance Objective For Smart Manufacturing -Prodmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Methods and Tools for Performance Assurance of Smart Manufacturing Systems

Kibira

Morris

Kumaraguru

2016

J. RES. NATL. INST. STAN.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The emerging concept of smart manufacturing systems is defined in part by the introduction of new technologies that are promoting rapid and widespread information flow within the manufacturing system and surrounding its control. These systems can deliver unprecedented awareness, agility, productivity, and resilience within the production process by exploiting the ever-increasing availability of real-time manufacturing data. Optimized collection and analysis of this voluminous data to guide decision-making is, however, a complex and dynamic process. To establish and maintain confidence that smart manufacturing systems function as intended, performance assurance measures will be vital. The activities for performance assurance span manufacturing system design, operation, performance assessment, evaluation, analysis, decision making, and control. Changes may be needed for traditional approaches in these activities to address smart manufacturing systems. This paper reviews the current methods and tools used for establishing and maintaining required system performance. It then identifies trends in data and information systems, integration, performance measurement, analysis, and performance improvement that will be vital for assured performance of smart manufacturing systems. Finally, we analyze how those trends apply to the methods studied and propose future research for assessing and improving manufacturing performance in the uncertain, multi-objective operating environment.

show abstract

Using Overall Equipment Effectiveness for Manufacturing System Design

Cited by 8 publications

References 11 publications

Methods and Tools for Performance Assurance of Smart Manufacturing Systems

Methods and Tools for Performance Assurance of Smart Manufacturing Systems

Invisibility of impact from customer demand and relations between processes in Overall Equipment Effectiveness (OEE)

Methods and Tools for Performance Assurance of Smart Manufacturing Systems

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About