2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.compag.2016.11.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using ordered weight averaging (OWA) aggregation for multi-criteria soil fertility evaluation by GIS (case study: southeast Iran)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
26
0
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
26
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…(2) Subjective weighting methods, such as Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) [34], could indicate decision makers' subjective preferences. However, when the number of decision data made by decision makers is less, the maximum or minimum value has a greater negative impact on weighting and can reduce the objective determination of the weight value [35]. In other words, if the traditional weighting methods are used to assign weights to the indicators, deviations can easily affect the accuracy of the evaluation results.…”
Section: Owa Operator Weighting Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(2) Subjective weighting methods, such as Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) [34], could indicate decision makers' subjective preferences. However, when the number of decision data made by decision makers is less, the maximum or minimum value has a greater negative impact on weighting and can reduce the objective determination of the weight value [35]. In other words, if the traditional weighting methods are used to assign weights to the indicators, deviations can easily affect the accuracy of the evaluation results.…”
Section: Owa Operator Weighting Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…指标进行标准化处理, 以消除量纲的影响 [14] 。隶属 度函数主要包括 S 型、 高斯型、 抛物线型等 [15,16] AB 属于 S 型隶属度函数 [4] 。而另一些元素并非越多 越好, 如当土壤中磷含量过高时, 不能被植物吸收 的磷元素会以难溶性磷酸盐的形式存在于土壤中, 使土壤盐化和板结 [17] ; 当土壤中氮含量过高时, 会造 成蔬菜体内硝酸盐含量超标 [18] 。因此, 土壤 pH、 全 氮、 有效磷、 速效钾四种指标选择抛物线型隶属度 函数。各指标隶属函数曲线转折点取值见表 3。…”
Section: 上的差异, 所以通过建立相应的隶属度函数对评价unclassified
“…Beberapa penelitian mengandalkan metode FLOWA karena memiliki cakupan yang lebih luas dalam skenario pengambilan keputusan, serta mampu menampilkan derajat risiko pengambilan keputusan yang menunjukkan besarnya risiko terhadap kesalahan dalam pengambilan keputusan (Cozzi et al, 2015;Romano, Sasso, Liuzzi, & Gentile, 2015;Vettorazzi & Valente, 2016;Mokarram & Hojati, 2017). Penelitian kesesuaian lahan dalam pemanfaatan energi dari biomassa hutan yang pernah dilakukan masih dalam batas kesesuaian lahan untuk penempatan instalasi pembangkit listriknya, dan seleksi tipe biomassa yang optimal (Perpina, Martinez-Llario, & Perez-Navarro, 2013;Recanatesi, Tolli, & Lord, 2014;Saelee et al, 2014).…”
Section: Pendahuluanunclassified