1995
DOI: 10.1177/147078539503700305
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using Optical Mark Read Surveys: An Analysis of the Response Rate and Quality

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1999
1999
1999
1999

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 18 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the late 1990s the list of variables tested continues to expand. Recent studies have explored an even more diverse range of potential response rate determinants including the effects of: optical mark read (Klose & Ball 1995); questionnaire identification numbers (Kalafatis & Blankson 1996); blocking within prenotification appeal (Nataraajan & Angur 1996); and facsimile (Tse, Ching, Dong & Fong 1994) and e-mail (Tse, Tse, Yin & Ting 1995) as alternative modes of delivery. As Moser & Kalton (1971) have highlighted, there are three influences on the response rate in a survey over which the market researcher has limited control its sponsorship, its subject matter, and its population.…”
Section: Inducing Responsementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the late 1990s the list of variables tested continues to expand. Recent studies have explored an even more diverse range of potential response rate determinants including the effects of: optical mark read (Klose & Ball 1995); questionnaire identification numbers (Kalafatis & Blankson 1996); blocking within prenotification appeal (Nataraajan & Angur 1996); and facsimile (Tse, Ching, Dong & Fong 1994) and e-mail (Tse, Tse, Yin & Ting 1995) as alternative modes of delivery. As Moser & Kalton (1971) have highlighted, there are three influences on the response rate in a survey over which the market researcher has limited control its sponsorship, its subject matter, and its population.…”
Section: Inducing Responsementioning
confidence: 99%