Ontologies of English 2020
DOI: 10.1017/9781108685153.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using Ontologies of English

Abstract: Research at York St John (RaY) is an institutional repository. It supports the principles of open access by making the research outputs of the University available in digital form.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
2

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 14 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Second, the exponential growth in information technologies and social-networking sites charted new territories and transformed advocacy-oriented professional groups (e.g., NNEST Facebook Group, TEFL Equity Advocates website, Multilinguals in TESOL Blog, Twitter hashtags, and accounts focusing on discrimination, among others) into the digital world. Third, recent scholarship has advocated that (in)equity, privilege, and marginalization in ELT are not uniformly experienced within (i.e., by both NESTs and NNESTs in a context-dependent manner) and across (i.e., not only by NNESTs, therefore invalidating universalized generalizations) closed categories of identity (Rudolph, 2019; Rudolph et al, 2015; Wicaksono, 2020). Moreover, together with personal and professional traits (e.g., race, ethnicity, country of origin, gender, religion, sexual orientation, schooling, passport/visa status, and physical appearance, among others), (perceived/ascribed) “nativeness” should be conceptualized in an intersectional manner as “part of a larger complex of interconnected prejudices” (Houghton & Rivers, 2013, p. 14).…”
Section: Introduction: Towards a Professional Movementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, the exponential growth in information technologies and social-networking sites charted new territories and transformed advocacy-oriented professional groups (e.g., NNEST Facebook Group, TEFL Equity Advocates website, Multilinguals in TESOL Blog, Twitter hashtags, and accounts focusing on discrimination, among others) into the digital world. Third, recent scholarship has advocated that (in)equity, privilege, and marginalization in ELT are not uniformly experienced within (i.e., by both NESTs and NNESTs in a context-dependent manner) and across (i.e., not only by NNESTs, therefore invalidating universalized generalizations) closed categories of identity (Rudolph, 2019; Rudolph et al, 2015; Wicaksono, 2020). Moreover, together with personal and professional traits (e.g., race, ethnicity, country of origin, gender, religion, sexual orientation, schooling, passport/visa status, and physical appearance, among others), (perceived/ascribed) “nativeness” should be conceptualized in an intersectional manner as “part of a larger complex of interconnected prejudices” (Houghton & Rivers, 2013, p. 14).…”
Section: Introduction: Towards a Professional Movementmentioning
confidence: 99%