Integrated Series in Information Systems
DOI: 10.1007/978-0-387-37022-4_4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using Ontologies in the Semantic Web: A Survey

Abstract: The Semantic Web is well recognized as an effective infrastructure to enhance visibility of knowledge on the Web. The core of the Semantic Web is ontology, which is used to explicitly represent our conceptualizations. Ontology engineering in the Semantic Web is primarily supported by languages such as RDF, RDFS and OWL. This chapter discusses the requirements of ontologies in the context of the Web, compares the above three languages with existing knowledge representation formalisms, and surveys tools for mana… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
67
0
7

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 92 publications
(80 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
(18 reference statements)
0
67
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…The goal is to observe the effectiveness of our approach with respect to heavyweight ontology-based approaches. On this regards, lightweight approaches (e.g., WordNet-based) can be considered practical and less complex, but they may lack to effectively deal with domain-specific aspects [17]. For this experiment, we have used the available experimental results of the two ontology-based approaches.…”
Section: Experiments 2: Comparison With Other Wsdl Readability Metricsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The goal is to observe the effectiveness of our approach with respect to heavyweight ontology-based approaches. On this regards, lightweight approaches (e.g., WordNet-based) can be considered practical and less complex, but they may lack to effectively deal with domain-specific aspects [17]. For this experiment, we have used the available experimental results of the two ontology-based approaches.…”
Section: Experiments 2: Comparison With Other Wsdl Readability Metricsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The goal was to observe the effectiveness of our lightweight WordNet-based approach with regard to heavyweight ontology-based approaches. Lightweight approaches can be considered simplistic and practical while they may be less effective to deal with domainspecific aspects, regarding heavyweight approaches [17]. The comparison was performed using the available experimental results of the two ontology-based approaches.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…OWL has three sublanguages: OWL Full, OWL DL and OWL Lite [14]. Existing Semantic Web ontology can be grouped into the following four major categories: metaontology, comprehensive, upper ontology, systematic domain specific ontology, and simple specialized ontology [15].…”
Section: Knowledge In the Expert Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Typically, they use ontologies as a base for metadata representation and reasoning, mostly employing RDF/OWL W3C recommendations for representation [7] and deal with issues of ontology querying as a kind of information retrieval [12]. They define new ontologies either domain dependent [6,19] or domain independent [11] and work on tools for ontology specification and maintenance [1].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%