2015
DOI: 10.1007/s40593-015-0077-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using Ontological Engineering to Overcome AI-ED Problems: Contribution, Impact and Perspectives

Abstract: This article reflects on the ontology engineering methodology discussed by the paper entitled BUsing Ontological Engineering to Overcome AI-ED Problems^published in this journal in 2000. We discuss the achievements obtained in the last 10 years, the impact of our work as well as recent trends and perspectives in ontology engineering for AIED.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
56
0
13

Year Published

2015
2015
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(70 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
56
0
13
Order By: Relevance
“…Ontology is considered to be a highly suitable means of supporting educational-technology systems [11]- [13]. The increasing importance of the Semantic Web, which is based on ontology, is strengthening this argument [14].…”
Section: B Applications Of Ontology In the Educational Domainmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ontology is considered to be a highly suitable means of supporting educational-technology systems [11]- [13]. The increasing importance of the Semantic Web, which is based on ontology, is strengthening this argument [14].…”
Section: B Applications Of Ontology In the Educational Domainmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We have made a study on an ontology for educational theories and a theory-aware and standard-compliant authoring system based on it [19,20]. Issues addressed in this study are 1) to make computers understand and utilize a variety of educational theories and 2) to keep sharability of designed scenarios with theoretical justification.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is another step forward in the improvement of ontology-aware authoring systems that offer intelligent guidance to design CL activities supported by theoretical knowledge that solves, at least partially, the problems of knowledge representation presented in [15]. The proposed system MARI supported by our model GMIP and theories described as ontologies allow us to work with theories at the macro and micro levels and to create a link between them.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to [15] there is a deep conceptual gap between knowledge of authoring systems. Because of that these systems cannot share or accumulate new knowledge, usually are based on only one theory that is built in the procedures (programming code) to support the design of learning activities, and do not justify their recommendations systematically and scientifically.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%