2016
DOI: 10.1521/aeap.2016.28.5.378
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using Online Settings to Identify Gay and Bisexual Men Willing to Take or With Experience Taking PrEP: Implications for Researchers and Providers

Abstract: Given the ongoing HIV epidemic, it is essential to identify gay and bisexual men who are interested in starting PrEP as well as active PrEP users. We report on online survey data gathered over a 17-month period in 2014–2015 from gay and bisexual men identified via six sources of recruitment (n = 2903): Facebook, a hookup website, two geosocial-sexual networking apps (herein “App 1 – Pop up ads” and “App 2 – Banner ads”), and two types of listservs (one focused on general gay nightlife, and one focused on gay s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Scholars have suggested that bisexual men may be less likely to receive HIV prevention information than gay men due to low levels of integration and acceptance in the gay community (Doll, Myers, Kennedy, & Allman, 1997; Kennedy & Doll, 2001). Although few studies have compared self-identified gay and bisexual men on HIV/STI testing and PrEP use, there is some evidence that self-identified bisexual men are less likely to get tested for HIV/STIs (Jeffries, 2010; Jin et al, 2002) and to use PrEP (Grov, Rendina, Jimenez, & Parsons, 2016) compared to self-identified gay men. Consistent with these findings, we also found that self-identified bisexual young men had lower odds of ever having an HIV test and lower odds of ever using PrEP compared to self-identified gay young men.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Scholars have suggested that bisexual men may be less likely to receive HIV prevention information than gay men due to low levels of integration and acceptance in the gay community (Doll, Myers, Kennedy, & Allman, 1997; Kennedy & Doll, 2001). Although few studies have compared self-identified gay and bisexual men on HIV/STI testing and PrEP use, there is some evidence that self-identified bisexual men are less likely to get tested for HIV/STIs (Jeffries, 2010; Jin et al, 2002) and to use PrEP (Grov, Rendina, Jimenez, & Parsons, 2016) compared to self-identified gay men. Consistent with these findings, we also found that self-identified bisexual young men had lower odds of ever having an HIV test and lower odds of ever using PrEP compared to self-identified gay young men.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies looking to replicate our findings should consider the strengths and weaknesses of various recruitment and sampling approaches to obtain the most representative sample of MSM. Lastly, we note that there are many venues in which we did not recruit from (e.g., bars/clubs, bathhouses) as well as emerging popular digital venues (i.e., geosocial networking apps like Grindr and Scruff) that may capture yet another segment of MSM (Holloway et al, 2014; Grov, Rendina, Jimenez, & Parsons, 2016). Future studies looking at sampling representativeness should also incorporate these survey modalities into their study designs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given the capacity to reach potential subjects, some researchers have successfully utilized Facebook for research advertisement. Through the use of filters (zip codes, gender, age, ethnicity) and interest terms, Facebook allows targeted outreach to certain populations [40][41][42][43][44][45]. Facebook can also adapt to preferences based on search history.…”
Section: The Changing Landscape Of Healthcare Delivery and Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%