Using Online Instruction and Virtual Laboratories to Teach Hemostasis in a Medical Laboratory Science Program

Abstract

Hemostasis laboratory testing methods have changed significantly over the past decades, from totally manual, to fully automated methodologies. Most medical laboratory educators prefer to use manual or semiautomated methods to teach hemostasis so that students can "see" what is occurring during the testing method, but many semi-automated instruments are no longer commercially available or are not cost-effective for education programs. In consideration of these factors and due to programmatic expansion to a coordinate campus, the CLS program explored new ways to teach hemostasis methods equitably and affordably across two distant locations. Working with an instructional design team versed in online education, five virtual hemostasis laboratory exercises were created that mimic the manual methodologies. Web-based didactic instruction was also developed to teach the testing theory and pathophysiology related to patient results. The efficacy of the virtual instruction was evaluated through assessment of student performance on exam questions, professional certification scores for the platelet/hemostasis sub-category, student satisfaction surveys, and evaluation of student performance during their clinical experience. Results showed that students in the virtual delivery format performed significantly better on exam questions compared to the traditional delivery method group, but there was no significant difference in their performance on the professional certification exam. Both student and preceptor feedback have been positive on the value of the exercises for students' understanding of hemostasis. ABBREVIATIONS

Video feedback and e-Learning enhances laboratory skills and engagement in medical laboratory science students

“…Literature reports improved gains through increased exam scores [15, 16], flexibility to learn anywhere and anytime [17] and positive attitudes towards virtual experiences [18]. However, comparable attitudes and performance to the traditional face-to-face instruction [19], or poorer results [4] have also been reported in the health sciences education literature.…”

“…Previously, this enthusiasm has been engendered through laboratory-based study, rather than in the lecture theatre using books and passive learning. Blended learning, using a combination of face-to-face and online activities, has proven to be comparable with or even improve the grades achieved by the traditional teaching of MLS [3, 4].…”

From Technical Assistants to Critical Thinkers: From World War II to 2014

“…Educators have creatively expanded this traditional model to include blended courses, entry-level master's, flipped classrooms, virtual laboratories, abbreviated practicums, reduced program lengths, and/or distance/online programs. [62][63][64][65][66][67][70][71] Yet as the roles on May 5 2021 http://hwmaint.clsjournal.ascls.org/ Downloaded from of medical laboratory practitioners expand, how can programs continue to incorporate the newer knowledge (healthcare reform, reimbursement, genetics, and molecular based testing) and skills (e.g., more critical thinking, advanced molecular diagnostics, interprofessionalism, advocating, consulting, and research) required to support the profession in the millennial healthcare expansion?…”

“…[62][63][64] Additionally, some programs have developed virtual, simulated laboratories and/or transitioned to virtual, digital microscopy. [65][66][67] Though the development of CT skills has been incorporated into the curriculum of medical laboratory practitioners in both the academic and clinical components for decades, approaches and methods for increasing CT have included the addition of problembased learning (PBL) exercises (often case studies) and clinical simulations have emerged within the last decade. These approaches foster development of CT skills by systematically solving problems and integrate knowledge from across all laboratory disciplines.…”

Do Science and Social Science Differ? Multi-Group Analysis (MGA) of the Willingness to Continue Online Learning

“…Studies of online laboratories used mainly as supplemental instruction have resulted in increasing test scores, improving students’ attitudes and preparedness for the hands-on laboratory and strengthening conceptual knowledge (Dalgarno et al 2009 ). Alternatively, in face-to-face laboratory experiences, the delivery of a remote or distance-based laboratory component has several advantages, including practically unlimited access and the ability to repeat the experiments (Conway-Klaassen et al 2012 ).…”