2006
DOI: 10.1007/s00766-006-0039-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using obstacle analysis to identify contingency requirements on an unpiloted aerial vehicle

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In order to discover features for a future air space management software system, exploratory creativity was followed during the analysis of requirements and emergent system properties [122]. Lutz and colleagues [115] presented an approach that performed KAOS Obstacle Analysis to explore requirements in a space defined by obstacles for a safety-critical, autonomous system. Salinesi et al [167] proposed a prototype tool that performed requirements-based product configurations within constraints.…”
Section: On the Way To Creative Requirementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to discover features for a future air space management software system, exploratory creativity was followed during the analysis of requirements and emergent system properties [122]. Lutz and colleagues [115] presented an approach that performed KAOS Obstacle Analysis to explore requirements in a space defined by obstacles for a safety-critical, autonomous system. Salinesi et al [167] proposed a prototype tool that performed requirements-based product configurations within constraints.…”
Section: On the Way To Creative Requirementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SFTA is a top-down, backward search technique that has been used successfully to find the possible software-related causes of a hazard or failure, e.g., on spacecraft [19]. SFTA has also been used to identify obstacles (such as false assumptions or unreliable behavior) to achieving the high-level goals (requirements) on an Unpiloted Aerial Vehicle [20]. The work [21] uses, in a synergistic manner, Fault Tree Analysis, Failure Mode and Effect Analysis (FMEA) and UML state-charts to derive, structure and integrate safety requirements of controlling software.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are several systematic ways to discover misuse cases, although no technique can assure completeness. Successful techniques include guideword-based inquiries for each use case [13], scenario-based searches [26], checklist-based investigations of historically troublesome features [30], automated contingency analysis [20], and use of completeness criteria [31]. Depending on the domain, multiple techniques have been used in combination.…”
Section: A Proposal For Eliciting Randarmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Contingency handling defines requirements for detecting, identifying, and responding to anomalous events. A process for contingency analysis during design has been developed 29 and is being implemented in the ADAPT domain. The approach involves two steps: (1) to integrate in a single model the representation of the contingencies and of the data signals and software monitors required to identify those contingencies and (2) to use tool-supported verification of the diagnostics design to identify gaps in coverage of the contingencies.…”
Section: B Contingency Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%