2017
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-13260-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using non-invasive transcranial stimulation to improve motor and cognitive function in Parkinson’s disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Abstract: Parkinson's disease (PD) is a neurodegenerative disorder affecting motor and cognitive abilities. There is no cure for PD, therefore identifying safe therapies to alleviate symptoms remains a priority. This meta-analysis quantified the effectiveness of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) and transcranial electrical stimulation (TES) to improve motor and cognitive dysfunction in PD. PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, Google Scholar, Scopus, Library of Congress and Cochrane library were searched. 24… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

5
41
0
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 87 publications
5
41
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In 2017, Lawrence et al [25] performed a detailed analysis of rTMS on different cognitive domains of PD patients with three included studies, which reported a negative outcomees. Another meta-analysis that conducted by Goodwill et al [26] with five articles also didn't found any significant effect for stimulation parameters on cognitive function. Although quantitative analysis was performed in these two studies, there is no further subgroup analysis for different rTMS parameters.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…In 2017, Lawrence et al [25] performed a detailed analysis of rTMS on different cognitive domains of PD patients with three included studies, which reported a negative outcomees. Another meta-analysis that conducted by Goodwill et al [26] with five articles also didn't found any significant effect for stimulation parameters on cognitive function. Although quantitative analysis was performed in these two studies, there is no further subgroup analysis for different rTMS parameters.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Several studies used tDCS as a single or adjuvant intervention in Parkinson rehabilitation (for reviews see Broeder et al, 2015;Elsner, Kugler, Pohl, & Mehrholz, 2016;Ferrucci, Mameli, Ruggiero, & Priori, 2016;Goodwill et al, 2017;Tahtis & Kaski, 2017). Improvements in upper limb performance of PD patients were found after anodal tDCS compared to sham when stimulation was applied to the primary motor cortex (M1) in rest (Benninger et al, 2010;Cosentino et al, 2017;Fregni et al, 2006) as well as during task performance (Salimpour, Mari, & Shadmehr, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[ 62 63 ] In PD patients, rTMS improved motor deficits (considering both UPDRS-III scores and gait parameters). [ 64 ] One recent case report of a narcolepsy patient who received 25 sessions of high-frequency rTMS over the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex demonstrated that rTMS might be a safe and effective alternative strategy for treating narcolepsy-like symptoms. [ 65 ] Efficacy conclusion for TMS is under investigation.…”
Section: Anagement Of E Xcessive mentioning
confidence: 99%