2018
DOI: 10.3233/jad-180229
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using Neuropsychological Process Scores to Identify Subtle Cognitive Decline and Predict Progression to Mild Cognitive Impairment

Abstract: Process scores can be integrated into the SCD criteria to allow for increased sensitivity and earlier identification of cognitively normal older adults at risk for decline prior to frank impairment on NP total scores.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
85
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 76 publications
(88 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
3
85
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Indeed, interventions, including novelty exploration, that relatively selectively induce depotentiation can trigger the erasure of newly formed memories or habits (Hayashi-Takagi et al, 2015; Medina, 2018; Ge et al, 2019). Investigating whether patients with early AD have a deficit in memory interference from novel information is a topic worth pursuing (Muecke et al, 2018; Thomas et al, 2018).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, interventions, including novelty exploration, that relatively selectively induce depotentiation can trigger the erasure of newly formed memories or habits (Hayashi-Takagi et al, 2015; Medina, 2018; Ge et al, 2019). Investigating whether patients with early AD have a deficit in memory interference from novel information is a topic worth pursuing (Muecke et al, 2018; Thomas et al, 2018).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An operational definition of SCD that captures both cognitive and functional decline has been recently proposed [ 68 ]. The analysis of qualitative and strategic aspects of cognitive performance such as process scores analysis, word-list intrusion errors, retroactive interference, and learning slope in SCD patients may increase the sensitivity and the earlier identification of cognitively normal older adults at risk for decline [ 82 ]. These findings suggest that widely accepted operational criteria and an in-depth neuropsychological evaluation may improve the prognostic evaluation of SCD patients.…”
Section: Operational Criteria For Cognitive Frailtymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Participants were classified as late pre-MCI SCD if they performed >1 SD below the age/sex/education-adjusted mean on two measures across different cognitive domains and were classified as MCI if they had impaired total scores on two measures in the same domain, or one impaired score in each of the three cognitive domains [16]. Furthermore, they also developed three neuropsychological process scores from AVLT, including intrusion errors, learning slope, and retroactive interference [17]. Participants were classified as early pre-MCI SCD if they performed >1 SD below the demographically adjusted mean on two measures across three process scores, or one impaired process score and one impaired total score of three cognitive domains.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Participants were classified as early pre-MCI SCD if they performed >1 SD below the demographically adjusted mean on two measures across three process scores, or one impaired process score and one impaired total score of three cognitive domains. The converted total Z scores on neuropsychological tests integrated into the MCI criteria [8, 16] and the process Z scores integrated into subtle cognitive decline criteria [16, 17] exhibited significantly improved sensitivity and specificity regarding the identification of MCI, MCI subtypes, and pre-MCI SCD among cognitively normal older adults.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation