2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.12.083
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using neuroimaging to individualize TMS treatment for depression: Toward a new paradigm for imaging-guided intervention

Abstract: The standard clinical technique for using repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) for major depressive disorder (MDD) is associated with limited efficacy to date. Such limited efficacy may be due to reliance on scalp-based targeting rather than state-of-the-science methods which incorporate fMRI-guided neuronavigation based on a specific model of neurocircuit dysfunction. In this review, we examine such a specific model drawn from regulatory focus theory, which postulates two brain/behavior systems… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
52
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 85 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
3
52
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Beyond increasing the ability to use combined brain imaging and stimulation to investigate brain function in normative populations, the present results suggest that DWI‐based TMS targeting can extend the effectiveness of TMS in therapeutic applications [Luber et al, ]. One obstacle for using TMS for effective treatments in memory disorders is that the brain region most critical for memory, the hippocampus, sits deep inside the brain, beyond the reach of direct TMS effects.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Beyond increasing the ability to use combined brain imaging and stimulation to investigate brain function in normative populations, the present results suggest that DWI‐based TMS targeting can extend the effectiveness of TMS in therapeutic applications [Luber et al, ]. One obstacle for using TMS for effective treatments in memory disorders is that the brain region most critical for memory, the hippocampus, sits deep inside the brain, beyond the reach of direct TMS effects.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Still, because of the large number of anatomical factors that are related to stimulation and the degree of variance left unexplained by gross non-brain factors, finite element simulations are well suited to quantify differences in the induced E-Field from TMS. Moving beyond biophysics, factors such as state-dependent features (Luber et al, 2017; Siebner et al, 2009) and functional organization (Drysdale et al, 2017; Rosso et al, 2017; Wang et al, 2015) will also affect stimulation outcomes. Although these biological variables unrelated to current modeling efforts will affect stimulation effects, understanding how the site of stimulation differs between individuals is an important step to understand biological contributors to inter-subject variability.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is to be noted that the system cannot currently utilize magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data to stimulate specific brain regions based on a participant's anatomy, as there is no provision for co-registering the subject's head to their brain images (Andoh et al, 2009; Luber et al, 2017; Schmidt et al, 2010). However, the open source nature of the software allows this function to be incorporated by a programmer with sufficient knowledge on Unity, signal processing, and neuroimaging.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%