2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.beproc.2010.01.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using network models of absolute pitch to compare frequency-range discriminations across avian species

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Songbirds are known to have better absolute pitch discrimination than humans [51][53]. For example, zebra finches ( Taeniopygia guttata ) could be trained to discriminate fine tones spaced 120 Hz apart, in the spectral region between 980 and 5660 Hz, parsed into eight ranges of five tones each [53].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Songbirds are known to have better absolute pitch discrimination than humans [51][53]. For example, zebra finches ( Taeniopygia guttata ) could be trained to discriminate fine tones spaced 120 Hz apart, in the spectral region between 980 and 5660 Hz, parsed into eight ranges of five tones each [53].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Having some experience at modeling avian perceptual processes myself (see Weisman, Hoeschele, M., Bloomfield, Mewhort, & Sturdy, 2010), I have some warnings to pass along. Showing that an idealized observer can solve a categorization problem is not the same as showing that it solves the problem in exactly the same manner as actual humans, and certainly is not the same as showing that it solves the problem in the same way as pigeons.…”
Section: Putting the Explanation Before Evidence That Anything Needs mentioning
confidence: 97%