2012
DOI: 10.1080/13645579.2011.625764
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using natural language processing technology for qualitative data analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
70
0
3

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 111 publications
(86 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
2
70
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Qualitative data from scanning is typically language based (Crowston et al 2012). Additionally, business intelligence includes both internal and external data (Lau et al 2012) that must be exploited.…”
Section: Domain Creationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Qualitative data from scanning is typically language based (Crowston et al 2012). Additionally, business intelligence includes both internal and external data (Lau et al 2012) that must be exploited.…”
Section: Domain Creationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, research examining the methodological merits of NLP techniques is necessary to further consider NLP as a feasible and high quality approach. Crowston, Allen and Heckman [9] reported a case study of the use of NLP for qualitative analysis of messages to understand interactions of software teams. They found that NLP methods performed well in terms of an accurate number of codes identified, a reduction in the amount of text that humans would also have to code, and increased speed of coding.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They found that NLP methods performed well in terms of an accurate number of codes identified, a reduction in the amount of text that humans would also have to code, and increased speed of coding. Aside from the Crowston, Allen and Heckman [9] groundbreaking study, little methodological research has examined NLP through the lens of qualitative analysis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The accuracy of current automatic approaches on the best performing codes in social science research ranges from 60-90% (Broadwell et al, 2013;Crowston, Allen, & Heckman, 2012;M. Evans, McIntosh, Lin, & Cates, 2007;Ishita, Oard, Fleischmann, Cheng, & Templeton, 2010;Zhu, Kraut, Wang, & Kittur, 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%