2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.rse.2020.111943
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using NASA Earth observations and Google Earth Engine to map winter cover crop conservation performance in the Chesapeake Bay watershed

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
28
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
1
28
1
Order By: Relevance
“…To analyze the growth pattern of cover crops, a threshold of 0.3 was applied on an average NDVI estimated for each cover crop field. In previous studies [16,17], a NDVI value higher than 0.3 provided an indication for a higher vegetation cover of winter crops. Using this threshold, the fields were grouped and labelled into four categories: Winter Hardy (significant growth in fall and spring), Winter Kill (significant growth only in fall), Spring Emergent (significant growth in spring), and Not Covered (no significant growth in both periods) based on their average NDVI over fall and spring.…”
Section: Field Datamentioning
confidence: 82%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To analyze the growth pattern of cover crops, a threshold of 0.3 was applied on an average NDVI estimated for each cover crop field. In previous studies [16,17], a NDVI value higher than 0.3 provided an indication for a higher vegetation cover of winter crops. Using this threshold, the fields were grouped and labelled into four categories: Winter Hardy (significant growth in fall and spring), Winter Kill (significant growth only in fall), Spring Emergent (significant growth in spring), and Not Covered (no significant growth in both periods) based on their average NDVI over fall and spring.…”
Section: Field Datamentioning
confidence: 82%
“…This capability has recently been bolstered by the availability of a large volume of freely available data from frequently revisiting medium-resolution satellites such as Landsat (30 m) and Sentinel (10 m). Since green and healthy vegetations have higher reflectance in near-infrared (NIR) than other spectral regions, prior studies have leveraged visible and NIR (VIS NIR) satellite imagery to understand, classify and monitor winter cover crops at a landscape scale [13][14][15][16][17]. For instance, Hively et al [17] assessed cover crop areas in Chesapeake Bay watershed in southeastern Pennsylvania between 2010 and 2013 using one image per winter collected from Landsat and SPOT satellites.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cover crops may be terminated by mowing, tilling, plowing, rolling, or application of herbicides when cover crops are still green. Remote sensing data have been successfully used to estimate winter cover crop biomass and percent ground cover [6,[11][12][13]. Mapping the end-of-season (termination) dates for cover crops at the field scale, however, has been a challenge due to the lack of high temporal and spatial resolution remote sensing data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In consideration of seasonality, cloud cover and phenological effects, we selected dry season remote sensing images (Landsat TM & Landsat 8) with a minimum cloud cover of <10% from Earth Explorer (https://earthexplorer.usgs.gov (accessed on 25 January 2022)) from 1998, 2008, and 2018 for land use/cover (LULC) change classifications, downloaded via Google Earth Code Editor [34,35]; see also [26]. The land use prediction was carried out using open-source software QGIS version 2.18 using modules for land use change evaluation (MOLUSCE) plug-in.…”
Section: Remote Sensing Image Classification and Predictive Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%