2021 IEEE 17th International Conference on eScience (eScience) 2021
DOI: 10.1109/escience51609.2021.00010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using Nanopublications to Detect and Explain Contradictory Research Claims

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 23 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…CS-KG can support several intelligent services that require a high quality representation of research concepts and currently rely on alternative knowledge bases which cover a smaller number of publications (e.g., AI-KG, ORKG, Nanopublications) or offer a less granular conceptualization of the domain (Seman-ticScholar, OpenAlex, AIDA). These include systems for supporting machinereadable surveys [46,30], tools for generating research hypothesis [20] and detecting contradictory research claims [3], ontology-driven topic models (e.g., CoCoNoW [5]), recommender systems for articles (e.g., SBR [41]) and video lessons [7], visualisation frameworks (e.g., ScholarLensViz [26], ConceptScope [47]), scholarly knowledge graph embeddings (e.g., Trans4E [29]), tools for identifying domain experts (e.g., VeTo [42]), and systems for predicting research impact (e.g., ArtSim [13]).…”
Section: The Computer Science Knowledge Graphmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CS-KG can support several intelligent services that require a high quality representation of research concepts and currently rely on alternative knowledge bases which cover a smaller number of publications (e.g., AI-KG, ORKG, Nanopublications) or offer a less granular conceptualization of the domain (Seman-ticScholar, OpenAlex, AIDA). These include systems for supporting machinereadable surveys [46,30], tools for generating research hypothesis [20] and detecting contradictory research claims [3], ontology-driven topic models (e.g., CoCoNoW [5]), recommender systems for articles (e.g., SBR [41]) and video lessons [7], visualisation frameworks (e.g., ScholarLensViz [26], ConceptScope [47]), scholarly knowledge graph embeddings (e.g., Trans4E [29]), tools for identifying domain experts (e.g., VeTo [42]), and systems for predicting research impact (e.g., ArtSim [13]).…”
Section: The Computer Science Knowledge Graphmentioning
confidence: 99%