2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.jas.2017.09.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using multivariate techniques to assess the effects of raw material, flaking behavior and tool manufacture on assemblage variability: An example from the late Middle Paleolithic of the European Plain

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
11
1
Order By: Relevance
“…All the 29 artifacts in this study were separately measured using a conventional attribute analysis (Ertmer 2012;Schäfer 1993;Weber 1986;Weiss 2015;Weiss et al 2017). We used this method as independent approaches to analyze the same tools (Table 1) with regard to different variables like conventionally measured minimum and maximum edge angles and intensity of retouch.…”
Section: Attribute Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…All the 29 artifacts in this study were separately measured using a conventional attribute analysis (Ertmer 2012;Schäfer 1993;Weber 1986;Weiss 2015;Weiss et al 2017). We used this method as independent approaches to analyze the same tools (Table 1) with regard to different variables like conventionally measured minimum and maximum edge angles and intensity of retouch.…”
Section: Attribute Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A principal component analysis was performed on five attributes of each artifact, using the R package "vegan" (Oksanen et al 2016): (1) the length-width-index (LWI) or elongation, calculated from the maximum length divided by the maximum width, (2) the width of each tool relative to its thickness, expressing the flatness of the artifact (Bordes 1961; Debénath and Dibble 1994), (3 and 4) the minimum and maximum edge angle of the cutting edge measured with a goniometer up to a distance of 5 mm from the edge, and (5) the ratio of the retouched to non-retouched edge length to get a measure for the intensity and quantity of edge modifications for each piece. For the application of PCA on stone artifacts, see e.g., Weiss et al (2017), among others (e.g., Golovanova et al 2016;Scerri et al 2016).…”
Section: Attribute Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The second part of the assemblage Goitzsche, as well as the collection from Löbnitz are stored in the Landesamt für Archäologie Sachsen, Zur Wetterwarte 7, 01109 Dresden, Germany. The datasets from Pouch, Löbnitz and Goitzsche have been already published by the author within four articles and his dissertation [1,19,51,61,62] and required no additional permits, which complied with all relevant regulations. The numbers of the individual specimens are provided within the text, the .RData file within the Supplementary Information to recreate the article with rMarkdown, as well as in the S1 Table. I incorporated 35 bifacial Keilmesser and 7 unifacially shaped Keilmesser (Table 1) from the sites Lichtenberg, Pouch, Löbnitz and Goitzsche (Fig 1) in my dataset.…”
Section: Artifactsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The site of Pouch [1,19,51,61,65], Saxony-Anhalt (Germany) was situated in the former open-cast brown coal mine Tagebau Goitzsche, quarry field Rösa-Sausedlitz, east of Bitterfeld. Volunteer archaeologists discovered the site in 2002 [19] and the find layers were excavated thereafter by the Landesamt für Denkmalpflege und Archäologie Sachsen-Anhalt-Landesmuseum für Vorgeschichte.…”
Section: Assemblagesmentioning
confidence: 99%