2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.jslw.2013.02.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using multiple texts in an integrated writing assessment: Source text use as a predictor of score

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
67
1
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 119 publications
(89 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
5
67
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, Mary might have planned to summarise ideas from the two sources and interpret relations between these ideas. However, evidence showed that she actually 'transformed' these ideas by lifting chunks of texts from sources and 'connected' them by using formulaic expressions, which is a typical feature found in low-scoring performances (Plakans & Gebril, 2013).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For example, Mary might have planned to summarise ideas from the two sources and interpret relations between these ideas. However, evidence showed that she actually 'transformed' these ideas by lifting chunks of texts from sources and 'connected' them by using formulaic expressions, which is a typical feature found in low-scoring performances (Plakans & Gebril, 2013).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results indicate that there is a threshold for reading comprehension in writers' ability of source use on integrated tasks. Another study by Plakans and Gebril (2013) investigated features of source use in 480 TOEFL iBT performances by textual analysis. They found that high-scoring texts included important ideas from both sources (i.e.…”
Section: Reading-into-writing Processesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Automated Essay Scoring (AES) systems constitute a relatively well-developed commercial technology for evaluation of students' written essays (Burstein et al 1998;Burstein 2003;Edelblut and Change 2004;Foltz et al 2013;Landauer et al 2003;Plakans and Gebril 2013;Rock 2007;Rudner et al 2006). They typically assign scores to essays on a 3-point or 4-point scale, and agree with human scorers as well as human scorers agree with each other.…”
Section: Automated Rubrics and Support For Source-based Writingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most accepted definition is that integrated writing tasks encompass several source texts to which the writers will respond to by combining the concepts in the source texts (Plakans & Gebril, 2013;Weigle & Parker, 2012). Delaney (2008) provided the evidence for the uniqueness of integrated writing construct that was unrelated to the constructs of reading comprehension or essay writing abilities.…”
Section: Source-based Writing Tasksmentioning
confidence: 99%