2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2005.08.027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using multiple indicators to evaluate the ecological integrity of a coastal plain stream system

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
20
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Fish has been identified as suitable for biological assessment due to its easy identification and economic value (Simon & Lyons, 1995;Smith et al, 1999;Siligato & Böhmer, 2001). Fish assemblages have widely been used as ecological indicators to assess and evaluate the level of degradation and health of rivers and streams at various spatial scales (Zampella et al, 2006). Plafkin et al (1989) observed that there are many advantages of using fish assemblage as biological indicator.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fish has been identified as suitable for biological assessment due to its easy identification and economic value (Simon & Lyons, 1995;Smith et al, 1999;Siligato & Böhmer, 2001). Fish assemblages have widely been used as ecological indicators to assess and evaluate the level of degradation and health of rivers and streams at various spatial scales (Zampella et al, 2006). Plafkin et al (1989) observed that there are many advantages of using fish assemblage as biological indicator.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The scoring criteria for each metric was 5, 3, and 1 followed by the criteria of Reference [1], which reflected that the biotic integrity either approximated, deviated, or greatly deviated from the pristine conditions. The final scores obtained after summing up all metric values led to evaluate as five categories of biological health from excellent (36)(37)(38)(39)(40), good (28)(29)(30)(31)(32)(33)(34), fair (20)(21)(22)(23)(24)(25)(26), poor and very poor (08-13). Detailed account of specified metrics and their characteristics as well as the respective scoring standards could be consulted from An et al [40].…”
Section: Modified Multi-metric Index Of Biotic Integrity (Ibi)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Establishment of Indicate System The establishment of evaluation index system is the basis of ecosystem integrity evaluation [15,26,31,33]. Domestic and foreign scholars have proposed "indicator species" for ecosystem integrity.…”
Section: Bmentioning
confidence: 99%