Using multilayer network analysis to explore the temporal dynamics of collective behavior

Abstract

Social organisms often show collective behaviours such as group foraging or movement. Collective behaviours can emerge from interactions between group members and may depend on the behaviour of key individuals. When social interactions change over time, collective behaviours may change because these behaviours emerge from interactions among individuals. Despite the importance of, and growing interest in, the temporal dynamics of social interactions, it is not clear how to quantify changes in interactions over time or measure their stability. Furthermore, the temporal scale at which we should observe changes in social networks to detect biologically meaningful changes is not always apparent. Here we use multilayer network analysis to quantify temporal dynamics of social networks of the social spider Stegodyphus dumicola and determine how these dynamics relate to individual and group behaviours. We found that social interactions changed over time at a constant rate. Variation in both network structure and the identity of a keystone individual was not related to the mean or variance of the collective prey attack speed. Individuals that maintained a large and stable number of connections, despite changes in network structure, were the boldest individuals in the group. Therefore, social interactions and boldness are linked across time, but group collective behaviour is not influenced by the stability of the social network. Our work demonstrates that dynamic social networks can be modelled in a multilayer framework. This approach may reveal biologically important temporal changes to social structure in other systems.

From Isles of Königsberg to Islets of Langerhans: Examining the Function of the Endocrine Pancreas Through Network Science

“…Layers are to that purpose typically generated on the basis of a series of (possibly overlapping) time windows and the nodes are linked only across sequential replicas to indicate identity. Mapping the temporal changes in connectivity patterns is meaningful in biomedical sciences as well ( 231 , 247 , 248 ) and could be very beneficial for the description of information flow and dynamic interaction patterns within the islets. More specifically, the activity patterns in these mini-organs are remarkably complex already under constant stimulation ( 147 ), and even more in a dynamic in vivo environment ( 67 , 249 , 250 ).…”

A tensor factorization model of multilayer network interdependence

“…Understanding the layer dependencies in a multilayer network can inform the development of survey design, identify redundancies, or illuminate contextual connections. Moreover, the usefulness of finding latent structure in the layers motivates the use of latent-space models as a noise-free smoothing of the observed network, as proposed by Fisher (2021) [23]. As such, there is potential to use this work to understand layer dependence in a variety of applications where domain-specific knowledge can make use of the interpretations that the NNTuck provides.…”

Animal social networks: Towards an integrative framework embedding social interactions, space and time

“…We hope that this will serve as a basis for novel questions and for identifying the methodological challenges to come in order to determine the relative influence of each of these factors by integrating interaction networks across levels of organisation (Brandell et al, 2020; Jacoby & Freeman, 2016; Sueur et al., 2019). A particularly promising line of research is the development of multi‐layered networks (Fisher & Pinter‐Wollman, 2020; Mourier, Ledee, & Jacoby, 2019; Silk, Finn, Porter, & Pinter‐Wollman, 2018), hierarchically embedded interaction networks (Montiglio, Gotanda, Kratochwil, Laskowski, & Farine, 2020), or bipartite networks (Massol et al, 2020) that can expand exploration of interactions beyond social groups, spanning from cells to whole ecosystems, and their dynamics. For instance, Massol et al, 2020 used bipartite networks to analyse the structure of host‐microbiota interaction networks.…”