Using Moral Foundations to Predict Voting Behavior: Regression Models from the 2012 U.S. Presidential Election

Abstract

The current research examined the ability of moral foundations to predict candidate choice in the 2012 U.S. Presidential Election across three studies. Results indicated that endorsement of moral foundations predicted voting outcomes beyond that predicted by important demographic variables that are traditionally included in election forecasts and research. When moral foundations were collapsed into two variables (individualizing and binding foundations), increased endorsement of the individualizing foundations consistently predicted support for Barack Obama, and increased endorsement of the binding foundations consistently predicted support for Mitt Romney. The most reliable unique predictor of candidate choice among the five separate foundations was purity, which strongly motivated support for Mitt Romney. Additionally, increased endorsement of the fairness foundation uniquely predicted support for Barack Obama. The effects observed across the three studies demonstrate a direct relationship between moral foundations endorsements and candidate choice. Implications for those using moral appeals in their political influence strategies are discussed.

Ideology Justifies Morality: Political Beliefs Predict Moral Foundations

“…; Schein and Gray ). The overwhelming majority of MFT applications assume that Moral Foundations cause political beliefs, or at a minimum that patterns of moral intuitions captured by Moral Foundations reliably predict political beliefs (e.g., Franks and Scherr ; Haidt ; Inbar, Pizarro, and Bloom , ; Kertzer et al. ; Koleva et al.…”

“…As such, they hold obvious importance, yet the extant research provides no clear answers. Given the growing scholarship using MFT as an explanation of political values (e.g., Clifford ; Clifford and Jerit ; Franks and Scherr ; Kertzer et al. ; Koleva et al.…”

Sacralizing Liberals and Fair‐Minded Conservatives: Ideological Symmetry in the Moral Motives in the Culture War

“…Past research has shown that liberals and conservatives rely on these moral foundations to different degrees; compared to liberals, conservatives tend to rely more on sanctity (and loyalty and authority), and less on fairness (and care; Graham et al., ). Individual differences in concerns about sanctity predict attitudes on an array of issues, such as abortion, euthanasia, and pornography (Koleva, Graham, Iyer, Ditto, & Haidt, ) and candidate endorsement in the 2012 U.S. Presidential election (Franks & Scherr, ). Moral foundations also explain individual differences in political involvement.…”

Shaping the modern world with a stone-age brain: Brexit and the Moral Foundations Theory

“…Both between and within cultures, MFT has also been used to explore differences in voting behaviour and attitudes between people on the political left and right. In a practical example, responses to an MFT questionnaire had strong predictive validity for forecasting how people voted in the 2012 American election (Franks & Scherr, 2015).…”