2013
DOI: 10.1177/1527002513490172
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using Monte Carlo Simulation to Calculate Match Importance

Abstract: This article presents a new method of calculating match importance. Match importance is defined as strength of relationship between the match result and a given season outcome. Probabilities of all necessary match result-season outcome combinations are estimated by Monte Carlo simulation. Using actual results of 12 seasons of English Premier League and betting odds, it is shown that both match result and season outcome predictions are realistic. The method provides results that are close to Jennett's approach;… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Mathematical certainty is a coarse measure of the swing value (Lahvička, 2015). Only 6.0% of team‐games are mathematically certain, most of which occur by the 15th game of a season.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Mathematical certainty is a coarse measure of the swing value (Lahvička, 2015). Only 6.0% of team‐games are mathematically certain, most of which occur by the 15th game of a season.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This incentive-based definition differs from past works saying that a game is important if its outcome has a large impact on end-of-season-outcomes (Geenens, 2014;Schilling, 1994). For example, Lahvička (2015) defines importance as the "strength of relationship between the match result and a given season outcome." According to Lahvička, a game that features a strong team against a weak one is unimportant because the outcome is almost certain.…”
Section: Swing Values and Identificationmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 3 more Smart Citations