2019
DOI: 10.1039/c9ra02406a
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using molecular dynamics simulations to evaluate active designs of cephradine hydrolase by molecular mechanics/Poisson–Boltzmann surface area and molecular mechanics/generalized Born surface area methods

Abstract: A quantitative assessment method for computational enzyme design was developed to rank the active designs of cephradine hydrolase based on molecular dynamics simulation.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A series of 10 ns trajectories were collected for structural and tunnel analysis. The binding energies were calculated with the Molecular Mechanics Poisson-Boltzmann Surface Area (MM-PBSA) approach and three types of the Molecular Mechanics Generalized Born Surface Area (MM-GBSA) approach [39] . The five replicas of molecular dynamics trajectories were extracted every 400 ps, producing a representative ensemble for each enzymesubstrate complex to estimate the binding energies between substrate and protein.…”
Section: Molecular Dynamics Simulation and Calculationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A series of 10 ns trajectories were collected for structural and tunnel analysis. The binding energies were calculated with the Molecular Mechanics Poisson-Boltzmann Surface Area (MM-PBSA) approach and three types of the Molecular Mechanics Generalized Born Surface Area (MM-GBSA) approach [39] . The five replicas of molecular dynamics trajectories were extracted every 400 ps, producing a representative ensemble for each enzymesubstrate complex to estimate the binding energies between substrate and protein.…”
Section: Molecular Dynamics Simulation and Calculationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here, DG binding describes the binding free energy of the protein-drug complexes, DE mm describes the gas phase molecular mechanics energy, DG pol and DG np describes the polar and non-polar solvation energies, respectively. The TDS component denotes the change in entropy at temperature T. Assuming that the NSP15-drug complexes experienced a similar change in conformational entropy, the TDS component was ignored to reduce the computational cost (Xue et al, 2019). The DE mm term can be broken down into two constituting components, namely bonded (bond, angle, dihedral and improper interactions) and non-bonded interactions (van der Waals and electrostatic contributions).…”
Section: Binding Free Energy Calculations Using Mm/pbsamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Evaluation of binding free energies through virtual screening has shown promise in efficiently narrowing the chemical search space for candidate compounds and streamlining the process of lead compound optimization. Outside of the pharmaceutical field, binding affinity predictions find additional uses in protein engineering, and guide the rational design of mutations altering enzyme substrate/product specificity ( Kaushik et al, 2018 ; Li Y. et al, 2019 ; Bhati et al, 2019 ; Ono et al, 2020 ; Chen et al, 2021 ), structural stability ( Aldeghi et al, 2018 ; Jandova et al, 2018 ; Pourjafar-Dehkordi et al, 2019 ; Martin et al, 2020 ), and catalytic efficiency ( Xue et al, 2019 ; Wang K. et al, 2020 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%