2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijresmar.2006.09.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using model-based expectations to predict voluntary turnover

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 69 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Turnover has thus been theorized as employees’ choices to leave an employer given their objective social location (such as age or tenure) or their subjective assessments of their situations3 (such as job satisfaction or turnover intentions; for examples see Bridges, Johnston, and Sager 2007; Crossley et al 2007; Donnelly and Quirin 2006; Mobley et al 1978; Mobley et al 1979). Therefore, in addition to assessing any direct effects of ROWE on turnover, our life-course model proposes that ROWE may moderate the effects of two sets of predictors of turnover capturing both employees’ social structural location and their subjective assessments of life-course fit or misfit.…”
Section: A Life-course Approach To Rowe and Turnovermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Turnover has thus been theorized as employees’ choices to leave an employer given their objective social location (such as age or tenure) or their subjective assessments of their situations3 (such as job satisfaction or turnover intentions; for examples see Bridges, Johnston, and Sager 2007; Crossley et al 2007; Donnelly and Quirin 2006; Mobley et al 1978; Mobley et al 1979). Therefore, in addition to assessing any direct effects of ROWE on turnover, our life-course model proposes that ROWE may moderate the effects of two sets of predictors of turnover capturing both employees’ social structural location and their subjective assessments of life-course fit or misfit.…”
Section: A Life-course Approach To Rowe and Turnovermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fundamental to our model is the assumption that an individual salesperson makes the decision to stay with the organization based on an assessment of the future utility of doing so, relative to that of leaving to pursue their career elsewhere. Our model explicitly considers how salespeople's expectations about their utilities evolve over time (see Bridges et al [10], Bentein et al [8]), as a function of their observations from on the job activities and selling success rates (i.e. how they use updated information).…”
Section: Key Constructs and Salesforce Turnovermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The past theoretical literature (e.g. McNeilly and Goldsmith [53], McEvoy and Cascio [52], Williams and Livingstone [67], Bridges et al [10]) provides conflicting and ambiguous conclusions to the performance-voluntary turnover relationship. Some researchers [34] and [22,27,49] have found that performance exerts a significant negative effect on voluntary turnover.…”
Section: Expected Performance and Turnovermentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations