2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.funeco.2018.01.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using mock communities of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi to evaluate fidelity associated with Illumina sequencing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
26
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 68 publications
0
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We urge further research into each step of soil sampling and processing to get a more complete understanding of how these decisions impact study results and interpretations. For example, several papers look at the impact of different bioinformatical pipelines on results (Bokulich et al, 2013; Cline, Song, Al‐Ghalith, Knights, & Kennedy, 2017; Egan et al, 2018). We are hopeful that this work will help scientists evaluate the costs and benefits of experimental approaches when studying soil bacteria and fungi.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We urge further research into each step of soil sampling and processing to get a more complete understanding of how these decisions impact study results and interpretations. For example, several papers look at the impact of different bioinformatical pipelines on results (Bokulich et al, 2013; Cline, Song, Al‐Ghalith, Knights, & Kennedy, 2017; Egan et al, 2018). We are hopeful that this work will help scientists evaluate the costs and benefits of experimental approaches when studying soil bacteria and fungi.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…PCR was conducted on the normalized DNA samples using forward universal eukaryotic primer WANDA 32 and reverse AMF-specific primer AML2 33 . This primer pair spans a variable 530-bp region in the SSU rRNA gene 34 . The PCR products were run on a gel to confirm the presence of DNA at 530 bp, then sequenced by Sanger sequencing at the UC Berkeley DNA Sequencing Facility.…”
Section: Molecular Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By using a strategy based on a nested PCR followed by MiSeq-Illumina sequencing and a phylogenetic pipeline that used a reference phylogenetic tree and an evolutionary placement algorithm (EPA; Berger and Stamatakis 2011; Berger et al 2011), we were able to annotate the studied AMF communities with high-throughput, at the species level. Egan et al (2018) demonstrated that MiSeq-Illumina sequencing can recapture an AMF community from a mock community, even in terms of relative abundances, suggesting a robust technique. However, they found a problem in taxonomy assignment that may be due to the gene region used which was a 500 bp fragment of the SSU rDNA region that does not provide species level resolution for many AMF (Stockinger et al 2010).…”
Section: Amf Species Delimitation Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, they found a problem in taxonomy assignment that may be due to the gene region used which was a 500 bp fragment of the SSU rDNA region that does not provide species level resolution for many AMF (Stockinger et al 2010). Also, the lack of type sequence representation in databases was mentioned by Egan et al (2018). Clearly, the selection of the DNA region is crucial to obtain sufficient phylogenetic resolution when characterizing sequences to the species level.…”
Section: Amf Species Delimitation Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation