“… Xiong Y, et al | 2018 | Prediction, Classification | NB, KNN, LR, ERT, GBM, XGB, SVM, RF, MC-SGE | Q1, Q3 | Transcriptomics | 73.2, 85.5, 87.9, 89.4, 90.5, 90.1, 90.2, 88.5, metric of F1 | 5-fold cross-validation, independent test for testing the generalization ability | PSSM-composition features | 30,682,021 [49] | This study focuses on the best way to use validated effector protein features for effector prediction using three machine learning classifiers, and compares results with those of others to obtain de novo results | Esna Ashari Z, et al | 2019 | Classification, Prediction, Clustering | SVM, E-SVM | Q2, Q3, Q4, Q5 | Transcriptomics, Proteomics | 94.05%, 93.64%, and 92.44%, for Models 1, 2, and 3, respectively. | 10 fold cross-validation | Optimal feature set includes 15 features (i.e, coiled coil domains, hydropath, PSSM composites) |
31,146,762 [23] | Enabling rapid assessment of mosquito blood-feeding histories and vectorial capacities using Mid-infrared spectroscopy and supervised machine learning . | Mwanga, E. P., et al | 2019 | Prediction, Classification | KNN, LR, SVM, NB, RF, XGB, MLP | Q1, Q2, Q3, Q4, Q5, Q6 | Proteomics, Fluxomics, Metabolomics, Cellomics, Population, Phenomics | Final model accuracy on hold-out dataset 98.4% | Stratified shuffled split cross-validation | Spectra intensities above 0.11 absorbance units |
31,778,355 [50] | The article is a review of recent applications of ML in infection biology, but also discusses the advantages and drawbacks of different techniques. |
…”