2011
DOI: 10.1111/j.1752-4598.2011.00170.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using meteorological and lunar information to explain catch variability of Orthoptera and Lepidoptera from 250 W Farrow light traps

Abstract: 1. Farrow light traps have been used in Australia since the 1970s to monitor locusts only, but catch variability has not been explained. Four light traps were operated at North Bourke, northern New South Wales, to study catch variability.2. Habitat did not influence catch composition (non-metric multidimensional scaling ⁄ analyses of similarity) or similarity. Assemblages of Orthoptera differed only modestly between December and March, whereas assemblages of macrolepidoptera differed strongly between December,… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
1
6
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, emerging adults of insects with aquatic larvae redistribute nutrients from freshwater to terrestrial systems (reviewed in Prather et al, ). To understand the activity and abundance of flying insects, many factors such as life cycles, seasonality, swarming behaviour, mass emergences, weather conditions, habitat type or even moon phase (Nylin & Gotthard, ; Steinbauer, Haslem, & Edwards, ; Sumpter, ) have to be taken into consideration. This is important as the resulting variation in time and duration of insect occurrence in turn influences insectivorous predators.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, emerging adults of insects with aquatic larvae redistribute nutrients from freshwater to terrestrial systems (reviewed in Prather et al, ). To understand the activity and abundance of flying insects, many factors such as life cycles, seasonality, swarming behaviour, mass emergences, weather conditions, habitat type or even moon phase (Nylin & Gotthard, ; Steinbauer, Haslem, & Edwards, ; Sumpter, ) have to be taken into consideration. This is important as the resulting variation in time and duration of insect occurrence in turn influences insectivorous predators.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The phototactic rhythm of pests are influenced by some factors, such as meteorological conditions (e.g., temperature, humidity, precipitation, light intensity), insecticidal devices(e.g., wavelength and height of insecticidal devices), physiological states (e.g., sex, age, and dark adaptation), and others(e.g., crop varieties, and natural enemies) ( Steinbauer et al., 2012 ; Van et al., 2014 ; Carayon et al., 2014 ; Affrin et al., 2017 ; Owens and Lewis, 2018 ).…”
Section: Factors Affecting the Phototactic Rhythm Of Pestsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…15.1e ) have been observed by MJS resting on E. dumosa in Murray Sunset National Park, south-western Victoria, while nymphs of G. australasiae (Leach) have been observed in leaf litter in Bronzewing Flora and Fauna Reserve. Both Slender gumleaf grasshopper ( G. vocans ) and Gumleaf grasshopper ( G. australasiae ) are probably among the more common members of a suite of nocturnal orthopteran herbivores of mallee and other eucalypt species in both western and eastern parts of the country (Rentz et al 2003 ;Steinbauer et al . 2012 ).…”
Section: Orthopteramentioning
confidence: 99%