2021
DOI: 10.1017/s003329172100180x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using Mendelian randomization analysis to better understand the relationship between mental health and substance use: a systematic review

Abstract: Background Poor mental health has consistently been associated with substance use (smoking, alcohol drinking, cannabis use, and consumption of caffeinated drinks). To properly inform public health policy it is crucial to understand the mechanisms underlying these associations, and most importantly, whether or not they are causal. Methods In this pre-registered systematic review, we assessed the evidence for causal relationships between mental health and substance use from Mendelian rando… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
33
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 179 publications
1
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our study has limitations: in all cross-sectional studies, associations may be bidirectional, or due to reverse causation, e.g. smoking and mental health, 33 religiosity and PTSD 34 . Moreover, although the breadth of UK-REACH data permitted adjustment for hypothesised confounders, residual confounding (due to missing data or measurement error) is possible in all observational studies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Our study has limitations: in all cross-sectional studies, associations may be bidirectional, or due to reverse causation, e.g. smoking and mental health, 33 religiosity and PTSD 34 . Moreover, although the breadth of UK-REACH data permitted adjustment for hypothesised confounders, residual confounding (due to missing data or measurement error) is possible in all observational studies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…We included in this section and heterogeneous group of nine articles that focused on psychiatric diseases not included in previous tables (Table 4) (Wium-Andersen et al , 2015a; Jang et al , 2020; Jefsen et al , 2021; Jin et al , 2021; Rosoff et al , 2021; Vermeulen et al , 2021; Zhao et al , 2021; Chen et al , 2022; Ni et al , 2022). Among these, we included three studies on BD (Wium-Andersen et al , 2016; Jefsen et al , 2021; Vermeulen et al , 2021).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The final set of MHWLs to be implemented in the online experiment was guided by a patient and public consultancy group. The MHWLs were informed by causal evidence of the effect of smoking on mental health (22)(23)(24)(25). The MHWLs were approved by three members of the public with lived experience of smoking and/or mental health in a consultancy focus group, which involved deep discussions around both the text and pictures to be selected for the current study.…”
Section: Stimulimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it is less well known amongst the general public and healthcare professionals that smoking can negatively affect mental health (19)(20)(21). A large body of evidence suggests that tobacco use increases the risk of developing depression, schizophrenia and bipolar disorder (22)(23)(24)(25), and that smoking cessation can reduce symptoms of depression, anxiety, and stress, and lead to improved wellbeing and positive feelings (26). Qualitative research suggests that people who smoke and have mental health conditions "buy in" to the idea that tobacco can worsen mental health, they understand that smoking can make their depression and anxiety worse, and that quitting could improve their mental health (27).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%