Using member checking in interpretive research practice

Abstract

Purpose In recent years, there has been a growing desire to more fully integrate informants into the overall research process. In response to this trend, the purpose of this paper is to scrutinize the usage and outcomes of the member checking technique for enabling more participatory interpretive research practices. Information systems (IS) research has utilized this technique, but it has not yet undergone a thorough analysis in this context. Additionally, interpretive IS research is in need of means and tools for engaging with informants during the data analysis and interpretation process. Design/methodology/approach The data for this study originated from an inquiry into the position of usability work within its cultural context, and this study has adopted a hermeneutic lens to make sense of the member checking technique, which positions informants as co-analysts and co-interpreters to make sense of both their organizational realities and researchers’ interpretations of those realities. Findings The analysis shows that during the research process, the informants reproduced, questioned, and cultivated the researcher-crafted texts that they were given to interpret, both individually and collaboratively. The study shows that member checking contributes to fulfilling the criteria set for interpretive IS research in a variety of ways. Research limitations/implications The study contributes to interpretive IS research method practice by offering IS researchers insights into and guidelines on the usage and potential outcomes of the member checking technique. Originality/value The examination of the member checking technique through a hermeneutic lens is a novel approach. For IS research, the study explicates the usages and outcomes of member checking in more participatory interpretive research practice. Also novel in this study is that member checking is examined as a collective endeavor.

Lived Experiences of Mental Health Recovery in Persons of Culturally and Linguistically Diverse (CALD) Backgrounds within the Australian Context

“…All data have been transcribed verbatim from the films freely available online in the participants’ own words, with the intention that their stories are faithfully represented (Lyons et al, 2013 ). In keeping with secondary data analysis, the primary researcher of the current study did not have direct contact with any of the participants, and thus member checking did not occur (Iivari, 2018 ). However, she has attempted to develop her own cultural humility (Bogle et al, 2021 ) through consistent consideration of personal biases as they arose related to being an Australian citizen born in that country, with European roots.…”

Not Just Bystanders: A Qualitative Study on the Vicarious Effects of Surgical Training on the Wellness of Support Persons for Trainees

“…The integrity of sensitive information was retained by using previously described fictionalizing techniques of nonfiction data 19 . Data representation reported for publication were verified through member-checking, enabling participants to review and approve discrete data used 20 . Participants who provided approval were also asked if they would be comfortable obtaining approval from the associated trainee.…”

“…19 Data representation reported for publication were verified through member-checking, enabling participants to review and approve discrete data used. 20 Participants who provided approval were also asked if they would be comfortable obtaining approval from the associated trainee. Only representative data with approval from both participants and the associated trainees were included.…”

Institutionalizing the Employer Brand in Entrepreneurial Enterprises

“…In order to enhance the trustworthiness, credibility, and internal and external validity of findings, member-checking was undertaken (Cresswell, 1998). This technique is popularly used in qualitative research, whereby a sample of research participants are asked to check, discuss, and modify the research data or interpretation (Iivari, 2018). Five participants were invited to perform member-checking to examine the research themes and analysis to make sure that the research interpretations are consistent with their understandings and inputs (Moroko and Uncles, 2008).…”