2013
DOI: 10.1007/s10742-013-0106-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using mediation analysis to identify causal mechanisms in disease management interventions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
41
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 77 publications
0
41
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Equation provides both the b and c′ pathways indicated in Figure by regressing the outcome on T, M, and X. Thus, b represents the effect of M on Y controlling for T and X, and c′ represents the effect of T on Y, controlling for M and X …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Equation provides both the b and c′ pathways indicated in Figure by regressing the outcome on T, M, and X. Thus, b represents the effect of M on Y controlling for T and X, and c′ represents the effect of T on Y, controlling for M and X …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mediation analysis overcomes this limitation by identifying intermediate variables that lie on the causal pathway and consequently mediate the relationship between treatment and outcome. Additionally, mediation analysis can serve to optimize an intervention by identifying activities that most reliably lead to the desired outcome …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this regression, the dichotomous variable representing the presence or absence of children's autonomous compliant response to limits was regressed on maternal authoritative limit-setting (mediator), maternal authoritarian attitudes, and covariates of maternal age, education, income, child gender, and hours of non-maternal care. The Sobel test provides a conservative test of hypothesized mediator effects when accounting for covariates in observational (descriptive) studies, and is also appropriate for use with dichotomous outcome measures (Linden and Karlson 2013; MacKinnon and Dwyer 1993; Zhao et al 2010). …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given the above notation, the direct effect represents 'a 1 ' and its indirect effect is 'a × b' [33][34][35]. This can be interpreted as a one-unit change of X 1 changes in Y by a 1 and further changes in Y by ab as a result of the effect of X 1 on M (indirect effect).…”
Section: Study Area Data Collection and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%