2015
DOI: 10.5194/hess-19-409-2015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using measured soil water contents to estimate evapotranspiration and root water uptake profiles – a comparative study

Abstract: Understanding the role of plants in soil water relations, and thus ecosystem functioning, requires information about root water uptake. We evaluated four different complex water balance methods to estimate sink term patterns and evapotranspiration directly from soil moisture measurements. We tested four methods. The first two take the difference between two measurement intervals as evapotranspiration, thus neglecting vertical flow. The third uses regression on the soil water content time series and differences… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
63
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(73 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
1
63
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The water balance method was validated by estimating the coefficient of determination (R 2 ) of the regression between the measured ET (predictor variable) and the modelled ET (response variable) on 25th, 28th, and 29th June 2012. Since the modelled ET is calculated from the integrated root water uptake profile, good fit between the measured and modelled ET indicates that the predicted root water uptake profile represents the true profile, which was shown in a prior study by Guderle and Hildebrandt (2015). A detailed description and evaluation of the method can be found in Guderle and Hildebrandt (2015) and Guderle (2015).…”
Section: Estimation Of Evapotranspiration and Root Water Uptake Promentioning
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The water balance method was validated by estimating the coefficient of determination (R 2 ) of the regression between the measured ET (predictor variable) and the modelled ET (response variable) on 25th, 28th, and 29th June 2012. Since the modelled ET is calculated from the integrated root water uptake profile, good fit between the measured and modelled ET indicates that the predicted root water uptake profile represents the true profile, which was shown in a prior study by Guderle and Hildebrandt (2015). A detailed description and evaluation of the method can be found in Guderle and Hildebrandt (2015) and Guderle (2015).…”
Section: Estimation Of Evapotranspiration and Root Water Uptake Promentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Although root water uptake profiles provide detailed information on resource uptake, plant growth, nutrient cycling, and species coexistence (Kulmatiski, Adler, Stark, & Tredennick, 2017), the majority of studies measured only total water fluxes, and did not differentiate it according to depth. We address this knowledge gap by using a data-driven method to estimate root water uptake profiles, such as by combining measurements of short-term fluctuations of soil water content (Guderle & Hildebrandt, 2015) with lysimeter-measured evapotranspiration.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yet, as change of soil water content with time is not due to root extraction only (i.e., soil water redistribution can also occur), the assessment of RWU based on water content 15 distribution alone is not possible in conductive soils . Rather, the full soil water flow equation accounting for root uptake and soil water redistribution must be solved in an inverse mode, and, with an accurate knowledge of soil and root properties RWU distribution can be inferred (Guderle and Hildebrandt, 2015;Hupet et al, 2002;Musters and Bouten, 1999;Vandoorne et al, 2012). Nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) imaging has been suggested as an adequate technique to measure water flow velocity in xylem vessels but no application exists yet on living roots in soils (Scheenen et 20 al., 2000).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The distribution of soil water content contains information of RWU distribution which is easily measured by adopting advanced technologies like Time Domain Reflectometry (TDR). The higher spatial and temporal resolution of soil water content provides a better information on root zone process (Guderle and Hildebrandt, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%