2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.trd.2010.06.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using measured instead of perceived noise in hedonic models

Abstract: This article appeared in a journal published by Elsevier. The attached copy is furnished to the author for internal non-commercial research and education use, including for instruction at the authors institution and sharing with colleagues. Other uses, including reproduction and distribution, or selling or licensing copies, or posting to personal, institutional or third party websites are prohibited. In most cases authors are permitted to post their version of the article (e.g. in Word or Tex form) to their pe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
40
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
40
1
Order By: Relevance
“…ose rent studies either use the net annual or monthly rent (Baranzini and Ramirez 2005;Baranzini and Schaerer 2007;Baranzini et al 2006;Brunauer et al 2009) or the monthly gross rent (Ban et al 2006). For other hedonic rent studies, it is not speci ed if gross or net rents have been used (e.g.…”
Section:         ()mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ose rent studies either use the net annual or monthly rent (Baranzini and Ramirez 2005;Baranzini and Schaerer 2007;Baranzini et al 2006;Brunauer et al 2009) or the monthly gross rent (Ban et al 2006). For other hedonic rent studies, it is not speci ed if gross or net rents have been used (e.g.…”
Section:         ()mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The introduction of "subjective" measures, based on people's perceptions, of either air or noise pollution has been exceptionally considered in the hedonic specification for house prices, probably because they are more difficult to obtain (Murti et al 2003, Hartley et al 2005, Berezansky et al 2010, while to the best of our knowledge there is no valuation of objective versus subjective air and noise pollution, as a whole, in the same model. Baranzini et al (2010) compare subjective and objective measures of noise but they do not consider air quality. It must be said that the combination of objective and subjective approaches is an idea that has been gaining ground in the literature.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Looking at hedonic evaluation of property in relation to traffic noise, Baranzini, Schaerer and Thalmann found a high correlation between measured, resp. extrapolated and perceived noise levels [59]. Neither of these studies investigated, though, whether socio-economic variables are in any way related to a variation in perception of comparable noise levels.…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%