2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.fusengdes.2021.112697
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using MAXFEA code in combination with ANSYS APDL for the simulation of plasma disruption events on EU DEMO

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Usually, MDs are more frequent but also hot VDEs can happen, often when the plasma is perturbated far from the neutral point or when the vertical position controller actuator is working near its limit. The MAXFEA simulation of JET discharge #92132 has been used as guideline in the investigation of plasma behavior during a set of possible MDs and hot VDEs, both occurring at start of flat-top phase (SOF) and at end of flat-top (EOF) phase [19].…”
Section: Type 1 and Type 3 Vde Analysis Considering Demo20171c Scenariomentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Usually, MDs are more frequent but also hot VDEs can happen, often when the plasma is perturbated far from the neutral point or when the vertical position controller actuator is working near its limit. The MAXFEA simulation of JET discharge #92132 has been used as guideline in the investigation of plasma behavior during a set of possible MDs and hot VDEs, both occurring at start of flat-top phase (SOF) and at end of flat-top (EOF) phase [19].…”
Section: Type 1 and Type 3 Vde Analysis Considering Demo20171c Scenariomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since in the halo module it is no longer possible to directly impose the evolution of the plasma current, the CQ is simulated imposing a certain negative voltage on plasma to reproduce a similar current evolution (see Figure 38). Although divergent behaviours are evident between simulated and experimental data at CQ starting time (see Figure 39), the proposed procedure could give useful indications on plasma centroid movement in vertical and radial direction to be taken into account during VDE analysis, considering all the possible sources of discrepancies due to the model simplifications introduced for MAXFEA code simulation and discussed in [19].…”
Section: Accepted Manuscriptmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Where c1, c2, c3, and c4 are creep constants; Єcr is equivalent creep strain; σ is Equivalent stress; T is Absolute temperature and t is time. The modified time hardening equation creep constants are calculated using a mechanical APDL curve fitting method (Lombroni et al, 2021) by inserting the creep curve data generated from the existing literature for PP (Crawford et al, 2020) and HDPE (Pan et al, 2016). The creep constants calculated by solver by using curve fitting method for PP and HDPE material are shown in Figure 5…”
Section: Boundary Conditions and Simulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A set of disruptions following plasma perturbations adapted to DEMO conditions has been simulated by means of MAXFEA happen, often when the plasma is perturbated far from the neutral point or when the vertical position controller actuator is working near its limit. The MAXFEA simulation of JET discharge #92132 has been used as guide in the investigation of plasma behaviour during a set of possible MDs and hot VDEs, both occurring at the start of the flat-top phase (SOF) and at the end of the flat-top (EOF) phase [19].…”
Section: Type 1 and Type 3 Vde Analysis Considering Demo20171c Scenariomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among plasma transients, H-L transitions and mDs have been considered, the latter both in SN and QDN configurations. The extrapolation to DEMO has been realized using the most recent DEMO reference geometries (2017 and 2020) [19]. Finally, the main conclusions are given in section 6.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%