2010
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.81.195204
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using magnetotransport to determine the spin splitting in graphite

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

2
11
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
2
11
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The 3D nature of the electronic band structure of bulk graphite is thus revealed at significantly lower tilting angles as compared to SdH and dHvA measurements. 38,40 In addition, our results show another difference in the properties of graphite and of multilayer epitaxial graphene, both of which are materials composed of layered graphene sheets and the nature of which is still subject to live discussions. While the response of Bernal-stacked graphite is, as demonstrated in this work, profoundly modified by the in-plane component of the magnetic field, no such effects have been observed for multilayer epitaxial graphene, 19 in which the unique rotational stacking of adjacent layers 49 ensures its dominantly 2D character.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 76%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The 3D nature of the electronic band structure of bulk graphite is thus revealed at significantly lower tilting angles as compared to SdH and dHvA measurements. 38,40 In addition, our results show another difference in the properties of graphite and of multilayer epitaxial graphene, both of which are materials composed of layered graphene sheets and the nature of which is still subject to live discussions. While the response of Bernal-stacked graphite is, as demonstrated in this work, profoundly modified by the in-plane component of the magnetic field, no such effects have been observed for multilayer epitaxial graphene, 19 in which the unique rotational stacking of adjacent layers 49 ensures its dominantly 2D character.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…The infrared magnetotransmission technique is thus, perhaps surprisingly, significantly more sensitive to the in-plane component of the magnetic field as compared to other techniques such as SdH or dHvA oscillations, which reveal the 3D character of graphite only for rather high tilting angles. 38,40 To interpret our data, we use the recently developed theory of the graphite band structure subject to a tilted magnetic field, which predicts the lifting of the twofold degeneracy at the H point. 43 This degeneracy, taking origin in the 3D character of graphite (four atoms in a unit cell instead of two for graphene), is an additional one to the valley and spin degeneracies in graphene.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…δg rms appears independent of B || , indicative of only a weak Zeeman splitting for in-plane magnetic fields. Although one possibility is that the g-factor is much smaller in the graphene plane, studies of graphite have shown this parameter to be isotropic [58]. A more likely explanation is an extrinsic, substrate-induced, anisotropy, and we note that a recent study of the spin states of graphene quantum dots also found a much weaker spin splitting for B || [59].…”
mentioning
confidence: 85%
“…The energy distance between two Landau sub-levels is at least the Zeeman energy, gµ B B (where g=2.5 [25]), as large as 8 meV at 53 T. A three-dimensional solid keeps its continuous spectrum, in spite of such a gap, thanks to z-axis dispersion. However, as soon as the field-induced order opens a new gap, the spectrum of the bulk electrons is no longer continuous and they are not expected to display metallicity.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%