2023
DOI: 10.1029/2022ef003291
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using Machine Learning to Cut the Cost of Dynamical Downscaling

Abstract: Minimizing the risks associated with climate change by strategic investment in adaptation requires a spatially detailed understanding of future local changes in climate (Marengo & AmBrizzi, 2006;Wilby et al., 2004). Local climate change information is typically obtained by downscaling coarse resolution (50-250 km grid spacing) global climate models (GCMs) run with different emission scenarios (Van Vuuren et al., 2011). Due to substantial biases in GCMs (Collins et al., 2013;Raju & Kumar, 2020), analyzing large… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 79 publications
(93 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In dynamic downscaling, physics‐based regional climate models, which incorporate topography, and land‐surface characteristics, are used to simulate data (Feser et al, 2011). Statistical downscaling approaches involve establishing a statistical relationship between variables simulated by the ESMs (predictors) and local‐scale observations or reanalysis (predictands) to correct ESM errors (Hobeichi et al, 2023). Compared with dynamic downscaling, statistical downscaling is more efficient and has proven to be effective in topographically complex terrain (Hanssen‐Bauer et al, 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In dynamic downscaling, physics‐based regional climate models, which incorporate topography, and land‐surface characteristics, are used to simulate data (Feser et al, 2011). Statistical downscaling approaches involve establishing a statistical relationship between variables simulated by the ESMs (predictors) and local‐scale observations or reanalysis (predictands) to correct ESM errors (Hobeichi et al, 2023). Compared with dynamic downscaling, statistical downscaling is more efficient and has proven to be effective in topographically complex terrain (Hanssen‐Bauer et al, 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main drawbacks of dynamical downscaling are the high complexity and computational cost [18]. Lately, some studies have combined the traditional downscaling approach with machine learning so that a collection of statistical models can emulate the downscaling [19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, computationally efficient statistical/empirical algorithms have been explored for RCM emulation, including simple multiple linear regression (Holden et al, 2015), multilayer perceptron (Chadwick et al, 2011;Hobeichi et al, 2023;Nishant et al, 2023), statistical analogues (Boé et al, 2023), and normalizing flows (Groenke et al, 2020). In both RCM emulation and other downscaling applications, there has been a shift towards regression-based deep learning computer vision algorithms such as CNNs (Babaousmail et al, 2021;Bano-Medina et al, 2023;Doury et al, 2022;van der Meer et al, 2023).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%