2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.jacep.2021.06.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using Machine-Learning for Prediction of the Response to Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
7
2

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
(55 reference statements)
0
7
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Our study presents novel findings relative to 2 other recent papers on applications of machine learning for CRT 27 , 28 and is substantially different from these other studies in the following ways. First, the analysis based on the SMART-AV study uses a single binary response parameter based on a composite outcome, 27 and the other analysis uses a single binary response parameter based on whether LVEF improved by 10%.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our study presents novel findings relative to 2 other recent papers on applications of machine learning for CRT 27 , 28 and is substantially different from these other studies in the following ways. First, the analysis based on the SMART-AV study uses a single binary response parameter based on a composite outcome, 27 and the other analysis uses a single binary response parameter based on whether LVEF improved by 10%.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 85%
“…Our study presents novel findings relative to 2 other recent papers on applications of machine learning for CRT 27 , 28 and is substantially different from these other studies in the following ways. First, the analysis based on the SMART-AV study uses a single binary response parameter based on a composite outcome, 27 and the other analysis uses a single binary response parameter based on whether LVEF improved by 10%. 28 In contrast, we used a multidimensional response outcome with 3 continuous variables representing different aspects of CRT response, which is then incorporated into a prediction model for long-term survival after CRT.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 85%
“…The datatypes used for these past reports have varied (electronic health records, clinical imaging, demographic data, electrocardiograms, etc. ), and the computational algorithms have spanned a range of simple regression models to more complicated approaches including gradient boosting [ 8 ], Naïve-Bayes [ 9 ], multiple kernel learning [ 10 ], random forest [ 11 ], adaptive lasso [ 12 ], and support vector machines [ 13 ]. In agreement with our results, the most important predictors from past studies have spanned different data types across comorbidity (e.g., ischemic cardiomyopathy and LBBB), electro-mechanical (e.g., systolic blood pressure, QRS width, and wall strains), and demographic data (e.g., age and sex) [ 8 , 10 , 12 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…), and the computational algorithms have spanned a range of simple regression models to more complicated approaches including gradient boosting [ 8 ], Naïve-Bayes [ 9 ], multiple kernel learning [ 10 ], random forest [ 11 ], adaptive lasso [ 12 ], and support vector machines [ 13 ]. In agreement with our results, the most important predictors from past studies have spanned different data types across comorbidity (e.g., ischemic cardiomyopathy and LBBB), electro-mechanical (e.g., systolic blood pressure, QRS width, and wall strains), and demographic data (e.g., age and sex) [ 8 , 10 , 12 ]. This diversity of predictor type further supports our underlying hypothesis that various data sources are not necessarily redundant and can therefore provide additive benefit for identifying CRT response.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The model predicted CRT response with 70% accuracy, 70% sensitivity, and 70% specificity. However, it has been stated that further prospective trials are required [6]. A call for referral and optimization of care in patients with CRT has been recently made by three European cardiac societies [7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%