2017
DOI: 10.1504/ijiids.2017.086194
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using logic programming for adapting models to metamodel evolution

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Difference engines may make mistakes by displaying false-negative or false-positive correspondences, as we have previously seen it in this paper and as confirmed in [41] . After the customization of difference results and for reusability goals, many works tackled the process of capturing and constructing evolution operators [42][43][44][45][46] . For instance, authors in [2] have defined a catalog of 61 reusable evolution operators (30 are atomic and 31 are composite) with the aim of treating the coupledevolution of meta-models (M2) and models (M1).…”
Section: Evolution Operatorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Difference engines may make mistakes by displaying false-negative or false-positive correspondences, as we have previously seen it in this paper and as confirmed in [41] . After the customization of difference results and for reusability goals, many works tackled the process of capturing and constructing evolution operators [42][43][44][45][46] . For instance, authors in [2] have defined a catalog of 61 reusable evolution operators (30 are atomic and 31 are composite) with the aim of treating the coupledevolution of meta-models (M2) and models (M1).…”
Section: Evolution Operatorsmentioning
confidence: 99%