DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-69858-6_28
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using Linguistic Knowledge to Classify Non-functional Requirements in SRS documents

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
43
0
1

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
43
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…to each word in each requirement. The POS tags 2 are necessary to perform the FR/NFR classification based on the approach of Hussain et al [6].…”
Section: A Part Of Speech (Pos) Taggingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…to each word in each requirement. The POS tags 2 are necessary to perform the FR/NFR classification based on the approach of Hussain et al [6].…”
Section: A Part Of Speech (Pos) Taggingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the classification of functional and non-functional requirements, we used the approach of Hussain et al [6]. We applied this approach to the unprocessed data set of requirements as well as on the processed one resulting from our preprocessing.…”
Section: A Rq1-influence Of Grammatical Temporal and Sentimental Sementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…dictionaries and handbooks. In addition, either a formal linguistic analysis implemented with the syntactic meta-language BackusNaur Form (BNF) [16] or a supervised machine learning decision tree [23] can be implemented to infer another implicit attribute that categorises the statements as functional or non-functional. These attributes coupled with the Apache Lucene 20 search engine, and the visualisation of semantic relationships (synonyms, hypernyms, hyponyms, etc.)…”
Section: Implementation Of the Framework -"How"mentioning
confidence: 99%