Using life‐history trait variation to inform ecological risk assessments for threatened and endangered plant species

Abstract

Developing population models for assessing risks to terrestrial plant species listed as threatened or endangered under the Endangered Species Act (ESA) is challenging given a paucity of data on their life histories. The purpose of this study was to develop a novel approach for identifying relatively data-rich nonlisted species that could serve as representatives for species listed under the ESA in the development of population models to inform risk assessments. We used the USDA PLANTS Database, which provides data on plants present in the US territories, to create a list of herbaceous plants. A total of 8742 species was obtained, of which 344 were listed under the ESA. Using the most up-to-date phylogeny for vascular plants in combination with a database of matrix population models for plants (COMPADRE) and cluster analyses, we investigated how listed species were distributed across the plant phylogeny, grouped listed and nonlisted species according to their life history, and identified the traits distinguishing the clusters. We performed elasticity analyses to determine the relative sensitivity of population growth rate to perturbations of species' survival, growth, and reproduction and compared these across clusters and between listed and nonlisted species. We found that listed species were distributed widely across the plant phylogeny as well as clusters, suggesting that listed species do not share a common evolution or life-history characteristics that would make them uniquely vulnerable. Lifespan and age at maturity were more important for distinguishing clusters than were reproductive traits. For clusters that were intermediate in their lifespan, listed and nonlisted species responded similarly to perturbations of their life histories. However, for clusters at either extreme of lifespan, the response to survival perturbations varied depending on conservation status. These results can be used to guide the choice of representative species for population model development in the context of ecological risk assessment.

Towards Precision Ecotoxicology: Leveraging Evolutionary Conservation of Pharmaceutical and Personal Care Product Targets to Understand Adverse Outcomes Across Species and Life Stages

“…In addition to considering the timing of critical life history events (e.g., development, rearing young), many more ecological or phenotypical attributes of organisms (e.g., size, feeding habits, life cycle duration) can influence the vulnerability of organisms to chemicals (van den Brink et al, 2011). Trait‐based approaches aim to understand such attributes and have proved useful by enhancing causal diagnosis and prediction (Rueda‐Cediel et al, 2023). These trait‐based approaches can be particularly useful at multiple levels of biological organization and can be used to describe three key aspects determining organismal vulnerability to chemical compounds: (1) exposure, (2) intrinsic sensitivity, and (3) recovery potential.…”