2016
DOI: 10.1007/s11367-016-1245-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using life cycle sustainability assessment to trade off sourcing strategies for humanitarian relief items

Abstract: Purpose While interest in supply chain sustainability has risen over the past few years in academic and business worlds, very little research has been conducted on sustainability in humanitarian supply chains, specifically. This study aims to contribute to the development of the field by conducting a life cycle sustainability analysis (LCSA) of sourcing scenarios for a core relief item in a humanitarian supply chain. Methods This paper is structured according to the LCSA framework developed by Guinée et al. (E… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
(51 reference statements)
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…van Kempen et al [89] To contribute to the development of the field by conducting a life cycle sustainability analysis (LCSA) of sourcing scenarios for a core relief item in a humanitarian supply chain considering the ReCiPe method and UNEP/ SETAC guideline…”
Section: Sustainability Principles and Corporate Sustainability Assesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…van Kempen et al [89] To contribute to the development of the field by conducting a life cycle sustainability analysis (LCSA) of sourcing scenarios for a core relief item in a humanitarian supply chain considering the ReCiPe method and UNEP/ SETAC guideline…”
Section: Sustainability Principles and Corporate Sustainability Assesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To overcome this challenge, different tools for monitoring impacts on sustainability like LCA (for example, [85,88]) or footprints methodologies (for instance, [101]) have been developed. In an international context, two of the most accepted methodologies are the Organizational Environmental Footprint from the European Commission, which measures the environmental impacts, and the UNEP/SETAC methodology, which measures social impacts [88,89].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They identified and categorized a list of barriers on the path of greening relief operations and stressed the dire need for studies about green HL. Van Kempen, Spiliotopoulou, Stojanovski, and De Leeuw () used life cycle sustainability analysis to compare procurement scenarios of relief items. The results showed that local sourcing is preferred to international sourcing in terms of environmental sustainability performance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, the findings of Piotrowicz (2018) supported implementation of local procurement in middle-income urbanized humanitarian settings, where infrastructures and operational markets exist. The results of Van Kempen et al (2017), as mentioned above, also advocated local sourcing in humanitarian context and showed its favorability in terms of environmental and social impact.…”
Section: Procurement Transportation and Inventory Managementmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…Van Kempen et al (2017) considered all aspects of sustainability in humanitarian procurement. They conducted life cycle sustainability assessment to compare different humanitarian procurement strategies in terms of sustainability.…”
Section: Procurement Transportation and Inventory Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%