2009
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2105-10-29
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using least median of squares for structural superposition of flexible proteins

Abstract: Background: The conventional superposition methods use an ordinary least squares (LS) fit for structural comparison of two different conformations of the same protein. The main problem of the LS fit that it is sensitive to outliers, i.e. large displacements of the original structures superimposed.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although there are several approaches to address this problem,57–60 we developed a robust statistical approach to automatically determine the appropriate transformation matrix, while simultaneously being aware of flexible and rigid parts within the protein. Our implementation is a modification of the wRMSD algorithm,61 where the superposition errors are Gaussian weighted so that residues that move the least have greater weighting andin turn dominate the computation of rigid body parameters.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although there are several approaches to address this problem,57–60 we developed a robust statistical approach to automatically determine the appropriate transformation matrix, while simultaneously being aware of flexible and rigid parts within the protein. Our implementation is a modification of the wRMSD algorithm,61 where the superposition errors are Gaussian weighted so that residues that move the least have greater weighting andin turn dominate the computation of rigid body parameters.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The second category of approaches is based on structure analysis methods, which are generally used in protein structure analysis. Specially, if given a pair of protein structures [7,11,14], the junctions are often found through structure alignment between the two proteins. If only an individual protein structure is given without referring to any other proteins [19,20], junction prediction usually takes advantage of some additional chemical information of the protein itself, such as amino acid sequences.…”
Section: Junction Detection For 3d Shapesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note that a class of junction detection methods (e.g. [7,11,14]) is based on shape alignment/comparison techniques, which first compare two or more different shapes and then determine the correspondences and junctions. Unlike the comparison-based techniques, our method only resorts to the geometric representation of the given individual shape.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, even for this purpose, the best way to overlay the ensemble members to calculate the “average” structure has not been standardized. Overlays are often performed based on all backbone or Cα atoms as well as based on a subset of such atoms from “ordered” residues subjectively defined by casual inspection of the initial overlay based on all atoms . Or one may use a program that more objectively weights atoms to optimize the superimposition.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Overlays are often performed based on all backbone or Ca atoms as well as based on a subset of such atoms from "ordered" residues subjectively defined by casual inspection of the initial overlay based on all atoms. [12][13][14][15] Or one may use a program that more objectively weights atoms to optimize the superimposition. Three of these are: THESEUS, an approach that superimposes structures using all atoms with maximal likelihood derived weights 16 ; CYRANGE, part of the CYANA software package that automatically identifies residue ranges to guide superposition 14 ; and SuperPose, a web server that defines regions to use for superposition by comparing difference distance matrices based on a-carbons.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%