2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.03.115
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using Large Eddy Simulation for understanding vented gas explosions in the presence of obstacles

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

1
50
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 133 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
1
50
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, it is still unclear whether they are fit for transient combustion phenomena such as explosions. All LES models proposed for premixed flame deflagration in the presence of obstacles are based on the FSD approach [19][20][21][22][23][24]. It has been shown that the identification of the combustion regimes through which the flame propagation evolves (ranging from the laminar regime up to the thin reaction zones regime) is consistent with the flamelet assumption on which such an approach relies [20,22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…However, it is still unclear whether they are fit for transient combustion phenomena such as explosions. All LES models proposed for premixed flame deflagration in the presence of obstacles are based on the FSD approach [19][20][21][22][23][24]. It has been shown that the identification of the combustion regimes through which the flame propagation evolves (ranging from the laminar regime up to the thin reaction zones regime) is consistent with the flamelet assumption on which such an approach relies [20,22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Recently, Di Sarli and co workers [13,14] demonstrated the importance of FSD based SGS model [1] to predict explosions in a vented chamber using LES. SGS modelling approaches that are seen as alternatives to flamelets include the filtered density functions (FDF) [15], the conditional moment closure [16] and the linear eddy model (LEM) [17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The approaches based on FSD are more reasonable in terms of computational cost yet well recognized in accounting for chemical reactions in the context of LES [31,32] with reaction rate being modelled as a function of the reaction progress variable and filter width. Recently, Di Sarli et al [33,34] showed the importance of FSD based SGS models [17] to predict deflagrations in a vented chamber using LES. Other SGS models that are seen as alternatives to flamelets include the filtered density functions (FDF) [35], and probability density function approaches (pdf-like methods) which include transported pdf [36,37], multiple mapping conditioning (MMC) [38,39], the conditional moment closure [40,41], the linear Eddy model (LEM) [42e44], the renormalization group (RNG) [7,45].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%