2007
DOI: 10.5558/tfc83326-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using knowledge of natural disturbances to support sustainable forest management in the northern Clay Belt

Abstract: Several concepts are at the basis of forest ecosystem management, but a relative consensus exists around the idea of a forest management approach that is based on natural disturbances and forest dynamics. This type of approach aims to reproduce the main attributes of natural landscapes in order to maintain ecosystems within their natural range of variability and avoid creating an environment to which species are not adapted. By comparing attributes associated with natural fire regimes and current forest manage… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
34
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
(43 reference statements)
0
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These can be described as either ecological restoration practices (Stanturf and Madsen 2002 ), e.g. extending thinning rotation periods, regulating stem density and regeneration to match wildlife habitat requirements, and mimic the effects of natural disturbances (Bergeron et al 2007 ;Silver et al 2013 ) or retention forestry (Beese et al 2003 ;Gustafsson et al 2010 ). Gustafsson et al ( 2012 ) defined retention forestry as "an approach to forest management based on the long-term retention of structures and organisms, such as live and dead trees and small areas of intact forests, at the time of harvest".…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These can be described as either ecological restoration practices (Stanturf and Madsen 2002 ), e.g. extending thinning rotation periods, regulating stem density and regeneration to match wildlife habitat requirements, and mimic the effects of natural disturbances (Bergeron et al 2007 ;Silver et al 2013 ) or retention forestry (Beese et al 2003 ;Gustafsson et al 2010 ). Gustafsson et al ( 2012 ) defined retention forestry as "an approach to forest management based on the long-term retention of structures and organisms, such as live and dead trees and small areas of intact forests, at the time of harvest".…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By preserving the structural attributes of old-growth forests, post-fire residual patches could represent a refuge habitat for many forest species [2][3][4], and could also constitute a source of propagules for recolonization of the burned matrix [5,6]. However, in managed landscapes, harvesting, including large-scale clearcuts practiced in the last half century, progressively homogenizes the forest mosaic and simultaneously reduces the proportion of old-growth forests [7,8]. Consequently, the simplification of internal structure of forest stands could cause a loss of habitat for species that require structures associated with irregular old-growth forests [9,10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In eastern Canadian boreal forests, fire return intervals often exceed the longevity of the first post-fire cohort of trees, leading to the development of increasingly complex stand structures characterized by multiple age cohorts of trees , Bergeron et al 2001, Groot et al 2004. However, because of relatively short forest rotations (c. 80-100 years), traditional even-aged silvicultural approaches threaten to truncate stand development and simplify forest structure across managed boreal forest landscapes (Bergeron et al 2001(Bergeron et al , 2007. "Multicohort forest management" (MFM) has been proposed as an alternative to the virtually exclusive use of such even-aged management in the boreal forest.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%