2022
DOI: 10.1007/s00221-021-06292-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using kinematics to re-define the pull test as a quantitative biomarker of the postural response in normal pressure hydrocephalus patients

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While the plethora of recent articles can be retrieved as one uses the search keyword of ‘biomarker and hydrocephalus’ ( Nakajima et al, 2010 ; Miyajima et al, 2013 ; Pyykko et al, 2014 ; Jingami et al, 2015 ; Kazui et al, 2016 ; Nagata et al, 2017 ; Abu-Rumeileh et al, 2019 ; Niermeyer et al, 2020 ; Nakajima et al, 2021 ; Torretta et al, 2021 ; Daly et al, 2022 ; Jeppsson et al, 2022 ; Mazzeo et al, 2022 ), we have not yet found literature focusing on ‘mRNA biomarker and hydrocephalus’. Instead, there were two recent articles related to ‘mRNA biomarker and Alzheimer’s ( Fiala et al, 2011 ; Isik and Beydemir, 2022 ), suggesting that most biomarker studies on iNPH and/or sNPH might be designed through fluid or CSF assays ( Nakajima et al, 2010 ; Miyajima et al, 2013 ; Pyykko et al, 2014 ; Jingami et al, 2015 ; Kazui et al, 2016 ; Nagata et al, 2017 ; Abu-Rumeileh et al, 2019 ; Niermeyer et al, 2020 ; Nakajima et al, 2021 ; Torretta et al, 2021 ; Daly et al, 2022 ; Jeppsson et al, 2022 ; Mazzeo et al, 2022 ). This highlights the novelty and utility of tissue assays in which mRNA markers were pursued with the caudate nucleus.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the plethora of recent articles can be retrieved as one uses the search keyword of ‘biomarker and hydrocephalus’ ( Nakajima et al, 2010 ; Miyajima et al, 2013 ; Pyykko et al, 2014 ; Jingami et al, 2015 ; Kazui et al, 2016 ; Nagata et al, 2017 ; Abu-Rumeileh et al, 2019 ; Niermeyer et al, 2020 ; Nakajima et al, 2021 ; Torretta et al, 2021 ; Daly et al, 2022 ; Jeppsson et al, 2022 ; Mazzeo et al, 2022 ), we have not yet found literature focusing on ‘mRNA biomarker and hydrocephalus’. Instead, there were two recent articles related to ‘mRNA biomarker and Alzheimer’s ( Fiala et al, 2011 ; Isik and Beydemir, 2022 ), suggesting that most biomarker studies on iNPH and/or sNPH might be designed through fluid or CSF assays ( Nakajima et al, 2010 ; Miyajima et al, 2013 ; Pyykko et al, 2014 ; Jingami et al, 2015 ; Kazui et al, 2016 ; Nagata et al, 2017 ; Abu-Rumeileh et al, 2019 ; Niermeyer et al, 2020 ; Nakajima et al, 2021 ; Torretta et al, 2021 ; Daly et al, 2022 ; Jeppsson et al, 2022 ; Mazzeo et al, 2022 ). This highlights the novelty and utility of tissue assays in which mRNA markers were pursued with the caudate nucleus.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to fully assess the entire spectrum of balance dysfunction, clinical discretion was used to unpredictably vary the pull force intensities throughout the trials. 6 However, the patient's pull test was scored solely on the first trial after the instructional trial, which was always "brisk," as required by the MDS-UPDRS PT scale. 7…”
Section: Task Detailsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conversely, "abnormal" pull test responses are typically characterized by slower rises to peak V COM as the patient reacts more slowly, followed by slower decreases to zero as the patient takes more steps to recover (Figure 1A, Patients). 6 Pull test step length (PTSL) was defined as the difference in foot position between the first step onset and first step land, and reaction time was defined as the time between the perturbation onset and the initiation of the first step (Supplemental Fig. 2).…”
Section: Data Collection and Variable Definitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations