2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2016.05.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using Interdisciplinary Workgroups to Educate Surgery Residents in Systems-Based Practice

Abstract: BACKGROUND Meaningful education of residents in systems-based practice is notoriously challenging, despite its recognition as 1 of the 6 Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education core competencies. To address this challenge, surgery residents and other members of the health care team were organized into interdisciplinary workgroups that were tasked with developing solutions to “systems issues” confronted on a daily basis. The project’s goals included providing more meaningful, hands-on educational e… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the risk of bias assessment, >65% of studies scored high on all 5 categories meaning that they had a non-clearly reported study design, lacked randomization, were prone to participants’ selection bias, had incomplete reporting, or lacked evidence supporting their claimed effectiveness. All but 2 studies 9,40 scored high on risk of being uncontrolled studies or without a comparative cohort, whereas all studies scored high on selective reporting except 5 studies 11,28,29,34,38 which were of unclear risk. Finally, 70% of studies scored high on bias on the statistical evidence supporting the effectiveness of the intervention, with only 2 studies scoring low 40,41 and 3 of unclear risk, 9,34,36 as shown in Figure 3B.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the risk of bias assessment, >65% of studies scored high on all 5 categories meaning that they had a non-clearly reported study design, lacked randomization, were prone to participants’ selection bias, had incomplete reporting, or lacked evidence supporting their claimed effectiveness. All but 2 studies 9,40 scored high on risk of being uncontrolled studies or without a comparative cohort, whereas all studies scored high on selective reporting except 5 studies 11,28,29,34,38 which were of unclear risk. Finally, 70% of studies scored high on bias on the statistical evidence supporting the effectiveness of the intervention, with only 2 studies scoring low 40,41 and 3 of unclear risk, 9,34,36 as shown in Figure 3B.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because of local resource limitations, many of the Moi residents rely on local literature to guide their care and to present during education conferences; as such, IU residents are then exposed to different types of scientific literature. With the focus of the Moi residents on adapting to resource limitations, the IU residents are exposed to systems-based practice in a manner separate from the interprofessional education models [ 6 , 23 ] and are part of discussions reviewing ethical decisions in providing care.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…65 Exercises involving trainees tackling true "systems issues" can be especially helpful in preparing them for practice, particularly when coupled with interprofessional collaboration. 66 These efforts to help trainees understand the infrastructure necessary to deliver high-quality neurosurgical care foster their development as clinically competent and safe surgeons. From the perspective of global health, a foundation in health systems science, health policy, and legislative advocacy provides physicians with a skillset necessary to take an active role in systems strengthening and capacity building.…”
Section: Interpersonal and Communication Skillsmentioning
confidence: 99%