The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
12th International Symposium on Temporal Representation and Reasoning (TIME'05)
DOI: 10.1109/time.2005.39
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using Inference for Evaluating Models of Temporal Discourse

Abstract: Abstract

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Currently, we consider the process fragments are in sequence but, in the future, we want to order the sentences and the independent clauses based on time structures. There is already research in this direction, one example being Stanford Temporal Tagger [33] or the work of Muller [34].…”
Section: ) Activityrelationshipminermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Currently, we consider the process fragments are in sequence but, in the future, we want to order the sentences and the independent clauses based on time structures. There is already research in this direction, one example being Stanford Temporal Tagger [33] or the work of Muller [34].…”
Section: ) Activityrelationshipminermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Section 1 covers the basic concepts followed by predefinitions in Section 2, and Section 3 covers the concept of time tagging. The 2 major temporal logics, Reichenbach's temporal logic (RTL) [25][26][27][28][29] and Allen's temporal logic (ATL), are explained before TimeML. Moreover, in the literature, both ATL and Allen's interval logic (AIL) are well accepted, and in this paper, ATL will be used.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In similar work on TimeML annotations,Setzer et al (2003;Muller and Raymonet (2005) add implied relations to annotated, temporal graphs.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%