2011
DOI: 10.1061/(asce)ir.1943-4774.0000280
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using Indicator Kriging Technique for Soil Salinity and Yield Management

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The estimated value in the unsampling sites by Indicator Kriging indicates the probability that the values are more or less than a specified cut-off. Indicator Kriging has been used in soil science, which included the quality of soils (Smith et al, 1993;Halvorson et al, 1996;Oyedele et al;, soil degradation (Diodato and Ceccarelli, 2004;Eldeiry and Garcia, 2011), as well as environmental risk of heavy metals (Goovaerts, 1997;Van Meirvenne and Goovaerts, 2001;Chu et al, 2010). Furthermore, the application of IK also spread into hydrology and water resource science, ecology, including groundwater pollution risk, potentiality of water resources (Lee et al, 2008;Jang, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The estimated value in the unsampling sites by Indicator Kriging indicates the probability that the values are more or less than a specified cut-off. Indicator Kriging has been used in soil science, which included the quality of soils (Smith et al, 1993;Halvorson et al, 1996;Oyedele et al;, soil degradation (Diodato and Ceccarelli, 2004;Eldeiry and Garcia, 2011), as well as environmental risk of heavy metals (Goovaerts, 1997;Van Meirvenne and Goovaerts, 2001;Chu et al, 2010). Furthermore, the application of IK also spread into hydrology and water resource science, ecology, including groundwater pollution risk, potentiality of water resources (Lee et al, 2008;Jang, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, variation on wine grape yield (total harvested weight) has been shown to vary 8-to 10-fold between areas within a single field (Bramley and Hamilton 2004). Numerous studies have investigated different soil and topographic influences on the spatial uniformity of crop yield for a variety of crops (Elms et al 2001;Kravchenko et al 2005;Eldeiry and Garcia 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For characterizing subsoil salinity, electromagnetic (EM) induction data (e.g. EM38) are an option because many studies have demonstrated how apparent electrical conductivity (EC a ) can be used to measure (Triantafilis et al ., ) and then to map spatial variability in salinity with depth (Eldeiry & Garcia, ; Li et al ., ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%