Abstract:Background
Acute respiratory distress syndrome carries a 40% mortality rate. Prone positioning remains underused owing to clinicians’ low degree of confidence, concern about the risk of adverse outcomes, and lack of staff competency training.
Local Problem and Purpose
A prone positioning protocol and educational program were needed in an intensive care unit to achieve compliance with best practices for treating acute respirat… Show more
“…[described in article] Implementation strategies include face-to-face education sessions, a video a quick reference sheet and web-based education. [no link to material] Montanaro [ 27 ] 2021 Mount Sinai Morningside Hospital, New York, USA. Using In Situ Simulation to Develop a Prone Positioning Protocol for Patients With ARDS.…”
Background
Ventilating critically ill patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome in the prone position is a life-saving strategy, but it is associated with adverse consequences such as skin damage.
Aim
To identify, review and evaluate international proning and skin care guidelines and make an inventory of commonly used equipment and training resources.
Design
A gap analysis methodology was applied.
Methods
1) Comprehensive search and evaluation of proning and skin care guidelines, 2) extensive search and listing equipment and educational resources, and 3) international consultation with 11 experts (8 countries).
Data sources
A variety of sources researched through July 2021 were used to identify relevant literature: (1) scientific literature databases and clinical trials registries, (2) intensive care and wound care associations, (3) healthcare organisations, (4) guideline development organisations, and (5) the Google search engine. Eleven international experts reviewed the literature and provided insights in two, 2-h online sessions.
Findings
The search yielded 24 guidelines. One clinical practice guideline had high methodological quality. Twenty-five devices/equipment and sixteen teaching materials were identified and discussed with the expert panel. The gap analysis identified a lack of concise, accessible, evidence-based guidelines and educational materials of short duration.
Conclusion
This analysis forms the basis for designing a competency-based education and training intervention for an interdisciplinary team caring for the skin of critically ill patients in the prone position.
Impact
The results can assist the multidisciplinary team to review their current protocol for prone positioning. This is a first step in developing a training package for clinicians.
“…[described in article] Implementation strategies include face-to-face education sessions, a video a quick reference sheet and web-based education. [no link to material] Montanaro [ 27 ] 2021 Mount Sinai Morningside Hospital, New York, USA. Using In Situ Simulation to Develop a Prone Positioning Protocol for Patients With ARDS.…”
Background
Ventilating critically ill patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome in the prone position is a life-saving strategy, but it is associated with adverse consequences such as skin damage.
Aim
To identify, review and evaluate international proning and skin care guidelines and make an inventory of commonly used equipment and training resources.
Design
A gap analysis methodology was applied.
Methods
1) Comprehensive search and evaluation of proning and skin care guidelines, 2) extensive search and listing equipment and educational resources, and 3) international consultation with 11 experts (8 countries).
Data sources
A variety of sources researched through July 2021 were used to identify relevant literature: (1) scientific literature databases and clinical trials registries, (2) intensive care and wound care associations, (3) healthcare organisations, (4) guideline development organisations, and (5) the Google search engine. Eleven international experts reviewed the literature and provided insights in two, 2-h online sessions.
Findings
The search yielded 24 guidelines. One clinical practice guideline had high methodological quality. Twenty-five devices/equipment and sixteen teaching materials were identified and discussed with the expert panel. The gap analysis identified a lack of concise, accessible, evidence-based guidelines and educational materials of short duration.
Conclusion
This analysis forms the basis for designing a competency-based education and training intervention for an interdisciplinary team caring for the skin of critically ill patients in the prone position.
Impact
The results can assist the multidisciplinary team to review their current protocol for prone positioning. This is a first step in developing a training package for clinicians.
“…I also monitor CCN's submissions to avoid having 2 similar manuscripts under review at the same time. For example, at the start of the COVID-19 pandemic, it was important to publish articles on prone positioning, yet we wanted to ensure that each article covered a different aspect of prone positioning, such as nursing management, 7 protocol development, 8 use of a proning device, 9 and awake self-proning. 10 For every newly submitted manuscript, 1 of 3 decisions are made before peer review: (1) reject, (2) return to the author for revisions, or (3) retain for peer review.…”
“…In the critical care setting, patients with ARDS and related conditions are often mechanically ventilated and placed in the prone position to further assist with increasing oxygen exchange to maximize ventilation and perfusion 6,7. During the global pandemic, as many as 67% of COVID-19 patients developed ARDS; this life-threatening complication carries a reported mortality rate of up to 40% 8,9. A 2023 study of mortality data during the first year of the COVID 19 pandemic in the United States reported an approximately 5-fold increase in deaths attributed to ARDS 10.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When the body is in supine position, the chest wall, heart, and adjacent organs naturally rest upon the lungs. When ARDS occurs, compression of the lungs by these organs, as well as an increase in lung weight due to edema or pulmonary fluid, further impairs ventilation and perfusion of oxygen 9. Placing these patients in a prone position alleviates compromised alveoli and improves oxygen exchange.…”
PURPOSE:
The purpose of this quality improvement (QI) initiative was to evaluate the effects of a repositioning intervention bundle on the occurrences and severity of hospital-acquired pressure injuries (HAPIs) of the face in patients with COVID-19–related acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) managed by ventilation and placed in a prone position.
PARTICIPANTS AND SETTING:
Eighteen critically ill, ventilated patients were placed in a prone position for extended periods (range, 1-13 days). The study setting was critical care units in a 504-bed nonprofit teaching hospital located in the Northeastern United States.
APPROACH:
Standard of care for the prevention of pressure injury (PI) in ventilated patients placed in a prone position at our facility included use of foam dressings over bony prominences on the face and the application of tape to secure the endotracheal (ET) tube as compared to commercial ET tube securement devices. We also placed a fluidized pillow with pillowcase wrapped with an absorbent pad under the head to absorb secretions. We added 2 interventions to our facility's existing HAPI prevention bundle. The first was a repositioning strategy; ventilated and prone patients were lifted by their shoulders by critical care RNs while their ET tube was stabilized by a respiratory therapist every 6 hours. The RNs then repositioned the patient's head and arms to the opposite side into a swimmer's position (head lying to the side with one cheek in contact with the fluidized pillow). The second intervention was micromovement of the head performed by an RN every 4 hours.
OUTCOMES:
Prior to implementation of the QI initiative, data collected during the early pandemic demonstrated that multiple patients developed facial PIs secondary to prone positioning; a majority were full-thickness or unstageable PIs, whereas a minority were partial-thickness PIs (stage 2). Following implementation of the QI initiative, data indicated that 5 of 18 (28%) patients placed in a prone position had HAPIs of the face; 4 (22%) of the HAPIs were stage 1 or 2 and 1 was unstageable. Patients were placed in a prone position from 1 to 13 days. All facial HAPIs developed within the first 2 days of placement in a prone position.
IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE:
The addition of an RN and a respiratory therapist repositioning intervention and micromovements of the head every 4 hours by the RN to an existing pressure prevention bundle during prone positioning led to a clinically relevant reduction in the severity of facial HAPIs. As a result, care for these patients has been changed to incorporate the repositioning interventions implemented during this QI project.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.