2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.jspr.2019.01.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using immobilization as a quick diagnostic indicator for resistance to phosphine

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
47
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

6
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
47
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) protocol, as described by the FAO Plant Protection Bulletin (FAO 1975), and modified by Agrafioti et al [ 8 ], was used for the evaluation of the occurrence of phosphine resistance for each population. In brief, twenty adults of each of the tested species and populations were placed in a 1.5 L glass jar and exposed to phosphine concentration of 30 ppm for 20 h. After the termination of the exposure interval, active—i.e., capable of coordinated movement—and immobilized—i.e., not capable of coordinated movement—adults were recorded, as described by Athanassiou et al [ 23 ]. The whole procedure was repeated three times (three replicates), with three sub-replicates each, with new phosphine production on each replicate, as suggested by Agrafioti et al [ 8 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) protocol, as described by the FAO Plant Protection Bulletin (FAO 1975), and modified by Agrafioti et al [ 8 ], was used for the evaluation of the occurrence of phosphine resistance for each population. In brief, twenty adults of each of the tested species and populations were placed in a 1.5 L glass jar and exposed to phosphine concentration of 30 ppm for 20 h. After the termination of the exposure interval, active—i.e., capable of coordinated movement—and immobilized—i.e., not capable of coordinated movement—adults were recorded, as described by Athanassiou et al [ 23 ]. The whole procedure was repeated three times (three replicates), with three sub-replicates each, with new phosphine production on each replicate, as suggested by Agrafioti et al [ 8 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In detecting and evaluating resistance to phosphine, there are several protocols that have been developed and evaluated 8,12,18–20 . A recent study, Athanassiou et al 19 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on the results above, further elucidating mobility after insecticidal exposure may be used to develop a comprehensive understanding of insecticide efficacy, and predict eventual mortality, as initial changes in mobility patterns may be correlated with mortality [18,19]. Thus, the objectives of this study were to (1) develop an experimental methodology for using Ethovision ® to examine the mobility of stored product beetles after exposure to an insecticide, and (2) to evaluate movement after exposure to an insecticide that is under development that includes deltamethrin, methoprene, along with the synergist, piperonyl butoxide.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%