2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.cviu.2014.04.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using image segmentation for evaluating 3D statistical shape models built with groupwise correspondence optimization

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Davies et al [9] show that MDL outperforms state-of-the-art registration methods for medical datasets. Gollmer et al [13] compare different objective functions. They show that while the determinant of the covariance matrix is easier to optimize, the results are comparable to results produced by MDL.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Davies et al [9] show that MDL outperforms state-of-the-art registration methods for medical datasets. Gollmer et al [13] compare different objective functions. They show that while the determinant of the covariance matrix is easier to optimize, the results are comparable to results produced by MDL.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For models of different compactness that describe the same data, the model with higher compactness and hence lower variance is favorable. It has been shown that minimizing the variance of a PCA model performs similarly to information theoretic approaches that aim at minimizing the description length of the model [13].…”
Section: Groupwise Correspondence Optimizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Recent advances in in vivo imaging of anatomy and the wide spectrum of shape modeling applications have led to the development and distribution of open-source SSM tools, further enabling their use in an off-the-shelf manner. Evaluation of SSM tools has been performed using non-clinical applications such as image segmentation [15] and shape/deformation synthesis approaches [13]. However, to the best of our knowledge, little work has been done on the evaluation and validation of such tools as related to clinical applications that rely on morphometric quantifications.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These advantages are quite important especially to complex threedimensional shapes (the overall dimensionality of a 3D shape as a whole is usually tremendously higher compared with its 2D counterparts). That is why this class of techniques is still quite prevalent [14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23], even though many more accurate nonlinear modeling approaches have been worked out. One thing to be mentioned is that a majority of linear modeling techniques adopt Principal Component Analysis (PCA) [24] as a fundamental tool to realize linear shape representation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%